期刊文献+

TCP Upload and Download Fairness over IEEE 802.11 Wired-cum-Wireless Heterogeneous Networks

TCP Upload and Download Fairness over IEEE 802.11 Wired-cum-Wireless Heterogeneous Networks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 A scheme of setting a limit to the TCP sending window size is proposed to improve the TCP fairness between upload and/or download flows in wired-cum-wireless networks. The goodput and delay of the upload and download TCP flows arc compared to evaluate the TCP fairness for different schemes, which are the different combinations of setting a limit (64 or 4) to the sending window size and using the delayed acknowledgement (ACK) scheme or not. Extensive simulation results and analysis show that ( 1 ) for TCP download flows, setting the limit of sending window size to 4 can improve the fairness; (2) for TCP upload flows, limiting the sending window size and using the delayed ACK strategy are both beneficial to fairness; (3) for TCP download and upload mixture flows, limiting the sending window size to a small value ( e. g. , 4) rather than using the delayed ACK strategy, is the solution to improvement of the fairness ; (4) a large delay interval (200 ms or 300 ms) does not result in improvement in fairness and performance; ( 5 ) a larger TCP packet size ( 1400 B) can improve the TCP upload goodput and decrease the download goodput; in contrast, a smaller TCP packet size (560 B) can increase the download goodput and decrease the upload goodput. A scheme of setting a limit to the TCP sending window size is proposed to improve the TCP fairness between upload and/or download flows in wired-cum-wireless networks. The goodput and delay of the upload and download TCP flows arc compared to evaluate the TCP fairness for different schemes, which are the different combinations of setting a limit (64 or 4) to the sending window size and using the delayed acknowledgement (ACK) scheme or not. Extensive simulation results and analysis show that ( 1 ) for TCP download flows, setting the limit of sending window size to 4 can improve the fairness; (2) for TCP upload flows, limiting the sending window size and using the delayed ACK strategy are both beneficial to fairness; (3) for TCP download and upload mixture flows, limiting the sending window size to a small value ( e. g. , 4) rather than using the delayed ACK strategy, is the solution to improvement of the fairness ; (4) a large delay interval (200 ms or 300 ms) does not result in improvement in fairness and performance; ( 5 ) a larger TCP packet size ( 1400 B) can improve the TCP upload goodput and decrease the download goodput; in contrast, a smaller TCP packet size (560 B) can increase the download goodput and decrease the upload goodput.
作者 任伟 金海
机构地区 School of Information
出处 《Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University(English Edition)》 2007年第2期89-95,共7页 西南交通大学学报(英文版)
基金 The National Science Foundation of Chi-na (No.90412010) the Major State Basic Research Devel-opment Program of China(973 Proguam) (No.2003CB317003)
关键词 TCP fairness Wireless networks Heterogeneous networks Performance evaluation TCP fairness Wireless networks Heterogeneous networks Performance evaluation
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部