期刊文献+

扩髓与不扩髓交锁髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折的比较 被引量:5

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较交锁髓内钉扩髓与不扩髓治疗闭合性胫骨骨折的临床疗效。方法对72例闭合性胫骨骨折患者随机采用扩髓与不扩髓交锁髓内钉固定,扩髓与不扩髓组均为36例患者,根据术前术中术后的临床数据来比较其治疗结果。结果两组患者在性别、年龄以及骨折类型方面均有可比性。扩髓组手术时间平均51 min,明显长于不扩髓组的40 min。扩髓组17周愈合,不扩髓组25周愈合。两组间差异有显著性,P<0.05。扩髓组有1例出现术后锁钉断裂,不扩髓组为6例,P<0.05,两组差异有显著性。两组均没有感染病例。扩髓组延迟愈合3例,畸形愈合2例;不扩髓组延迟愈合5例,畸形愈合3例,两组无显著性差异。结论治疗闭合性胫骨骨折,扩髓交锁髓内钉在疗效上要优于不扩髓。
出处 《实用骨科杂志》 2007年第4期235-237,共3页 Journal of Practical Orthopaedics
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Finkemeier CG,Schmidt AH,Kyle RF,et al.A prospective,randomized study of intramedullary nails inserted with and without reaming for the treatment of open and closed fractures of the tibial shaft[J].J Orthop Trauma,2000,14(3):187-193.
  • 2Blachut PA,O'Brien PJ,Meek RN,et al.Interlocking intramedullary nailing with and without reaming for the treatment of closed fractures of the tibial shaft.A prospective,randomized study[J].J Bone Joint Surg (Am),1997,79(5):640-646.
  • 3Larsen LB,Madsen JE,Hoiness PR,et al.Should insertion of intramedullary nails for tibial fractures be with or without reaming? A prospective,randomized study with 3.8 years'follow-up[J].J Orthop Trauma,2004,18(3):144-149.
  • 4Klein MP,Rahn BA,Frigg R,et al.Reaming versus non-reaming in medullary nailing:interference with cortical circulation of the canine tibia[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,1990,109(6):314-316.
  • 5Reichert IL,McCarthy ID,Hughes SP.The acute vascular response to intramedullary reaming.Microsphere estimation of blood flow in the intact ovine tibia[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Br),1995,77(3):490-493.
  • 6Schemitsch EH,Kowalski MJ,Swiontkowski MF,el al.Comparison of the effect of reamed and unreamed locked intramedullary nailing on blood flow in the callus and strength of union following fracture of the sheep tibia[J].J Orthop Res,1995,13(3):382-389.

同被引文献39

引证文献5

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部