期刊文献+

汉学主义的“超越”与“内在超越”——余英时和列文森中国思想文化研究比较 被引量:1

Transcendanding and Intertranscending of Orientalism——Compare the Studies on Chinese Thought and Culture by Joseph Levenson and Yu-Yingshi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 西方汉学对中国思想文化的研究有着类似于赛义德使用的“东方主义”的“汉学主义”的特征,这种特征有时表现得非常隐蔽。将列文森和余英时这一中一西两位学者对中国思想文化研究进行比较,发现“汉学主义”对他们学术研究的影响,及他们自身对所处“汉学主义”环境的“内在超越”和“超越”。 The research on Chinese culture of Sinology has some kind of feature which should be called Sinolism similar to Orientalism observed by Edward W. Sid. This feature sometimes is very obscure. This essay will compare the studies on Chinese thought and culture by Joseph Levenson and Yu Yingshi, one Chinese scholar and one western scholar, figuring out the influence of Sinolism on their studies and their reaction to the Sonolism environment, intertranscending and transcending.
作者 顾卉
出处 《江苏教育学院学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第2期51-53,共3页 Journal of Jiangsu Institute of Education(Social Science)
关键词 西方汉学 汉学主义 内在超越 超越 Sinology orientalism Joseph Levenson intertranscend Yu Yingshi transcend
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献7

  • 1牟宗三 等.为中国文化敬告世界人士宣言[A].封祖盛.当代新儒家[C].北京:三联书店,1989..
  • 2余英时.朱熹的历史世界:上篇[M].台北:允晨文化实业股份有限公司,2003.42.
  • 3余英时.朱熹的历史世界:下篇[M].台北:允晨文化实业股份有限公司,2003.35.
  • 4余英时.我摧毁了朱熹的价值世界吗[J].台北:当代,2004,(197).
  • 5王邦雄.当代新儒家面对的问题及其开展[A].封祖盛.当代新儒家[C].北京:三联书店,1989.197.
  • 6余英时.试说儒家的整体规划[J].九州学林,2004,.
  • 7余英时.犹忆风吹水上鳞[M].台北:三民书局股份有限公司,1991.98.

共引文献4

同被引文献28

  • 1Adrian Hsia, Chinesia : The European Construction of China in the Literature of the 17 th and 18th Centuries, Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1998.
  • 2Adrian Hsia, Chinesia: The European Construction of China in the Literature of the 17th and 18th Centuries, p. 7.
  • 3Bob Hodge and Kam Louie, The Politics of Chinese Language and Culture: The Art of Reading Dragons, pp. 12 - 17.
  • 4张西平.《萨义德的<东方学>与西方汉学》,李雪涛.《日耳曼学术谱系中的汉学--德国汉学之研究》,北京.外语教学与研究出版杜,2008年.
  • 5Said, Orientalism, New York : Vintage Books, 1979, pp. 21 - 22.
  • 6Ezra F. Vogel, " Contemporary China Studies in North America: Marginals in a Superpower," in Hsin-chi Kuan (ed.), The Development of Contemporary China Studies, Tokyo: The Center of East Asian Cultural Studies for UNESCO, 1994, p. 190.
  • 7Said, Orientalism, p. 15.
  • 8Bernard Lewis, Islam and The West (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993 ).
  • 9John M. Mackenzie, Orientalism: History, Theory and the Arts (Manchester and New York : Manchester University Press, 1995).
  • 10Simon Lays, The Burning Forest: Essays on Chinese Culture and Polities (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1985), pp.95-99.

引证文献1

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部