摘要
从学术史角度看,司马迁的《史记》之“五帝”、“三代”本纪在反映中国上古文明史方面,有相当的客观可靠性。这种客观可靠性是建立在司马迁继承家学与师承、熔铸先秦典籍以及注重实地考察等基础之上的。但从今天的唯物史观看,《史记》之“五帝”与“三代”本纪也存在着时代局限。这主要表现在司马迁编纂《史记》时所参用的先秦资料不全面,也表现在以儒家思想为选材标准的片面性等方面。
From the angle of Chinese intellectual history research, "Benji', sections of Shift written by SIMA Qian offer us quite a few objective and credible historical materials for reflecting Chinese ancient civilization history because of three reasons including SIMA Qian' s intellectual knowledge inherited from his family and teachers, digesting pre - Qin works widely and field surveying. In the same time, there are still many limitations of times in "Benji" sections of Shift by his one-sidedness and standards on selecting historical materials.
出处
《烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
北大核心
2007年第1期85-94,共10页
Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
关键词
司马迁
五帝本纪
三代本纪
可信性
局限性
SIMA Qian
the Wudi Benji section
the Xia Shang Zhou Benji sections
credibility
limitation