期刊文献+

从系统功能语法看演讲语篇中意识形态的体现——批评话语分析的一个实例研究 被引量:5

A Study of Ideology in Speech from the Perspective of Systemic-Functional Grammar——A case study of CDA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 批评话语分析在语言学理论和实践上吸收了M.A.K Halliday的系统功能语法的思想,认为语言是一种社会实践,语言与社会结构是密不可分的.意识形态作为社会上层建筑,是社会结构中的一个重要方面.在政治演说中,演说者的目的不在于向听众提供信息,而在于劝诱,在于对意识形态的控制,而意识形态一般隐含在不同的语言手段中.林肯的《葛底斯堡演说》中,意识形态体现在不同的语言层面.演说者通过语言结构的选择来反映其意识形态. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), theoretically and practically based on Systemic-Functional Grammar (SFG) proposed by M. A. K. Halliday, regards language as a kind of social practice and an inseparable part of social construction among which ideology serves as an indispensable part. In most political speech, the politicians purpose is not to provide information for the audience but persuade - to subject the common public to certain ideologies which are usually coded implicitly behind the overt propositions. In Abraham Lincoln's Address at Gettysburg, on different language scales underlies many ideologies supposed to impose on the audience. This paper attempts to explore them from different language structures by adopting some theories in SFG.
作者 陈雁
出处 《昭通师范高等专科学校学报》 2007年第2期45-48,共4页 Journal of Zhaotong Teacher's College
关键词 批评话语分析 系统功能语法 意识形态 语言结构 critical discourse analysis systemic-functional grammar ideology language structures
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Titscher Stefan, Meyer Michael, Wodak Ruth, et al. Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis[M]. London: SAGE Publications, 2000.
  • 2Van Dijk T A. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach[M]. London: SAGE Publications, 1998.
  • 3胡壮臃,朱永生,张德禄.系统功能语法概论[M].长沙:湖南教育出版社,1989.
  • 4吴建刚.论批评话语分析[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002,41(3):42-48. 被引量:46
  • 5Thompson Geoff. Introducing Functional Grammar[M]. London: Edward Arnold Ltd, 1996.
  • 6Martin J R. Beyond Exchange: Appraisal systems in English [A]. Hunston,Thompson. Evaluation in Text[C].London: Oxford University Press, 2000. 142-175.

二级参考文献19

  • 1N, Fairclough. Discourse and Text: linguistic and intertextual analysis [J], Discourse & Society, 3 (2).Sage Publications, 1992.
  • 2T, N, Htckin. Criticai Discourse Analysis[A], http://www. exchanges.state.gov/education/engteaching/pubs/BR/functionalsec 3- 6. htm.
  • 3VanDijk. Critical Discourse Analysis[M]. 1998, http ://www. hum. uva.nl/-teun/cda. htm.
  • 4A, Luke. Theory and Practice in Critical Discours Analysis[J]. http://www. gseis. ucla. edu/courses./ed25 3a/ Loke/SAHA 6. htm.
  • 5N. Fainlough/R Wodak . Critical Discourse Analysis[A]. Van Dijk (eds.): Discourse as Social Interaction:A Multdisciplinary Introduction[C]. Volume2. London, 1997.
  • 6V, Dijk, Ideology and discourse A Muhidisciplinary Introduction[M], http://www. hum. uva. nl/teun/ideo -cis2. htm.
  • 7B, Yousman. Who owns Identity? Malcolm X, Representation, and the Struggle Over Meaning [J].Communication Quarterly 49(1). Eastern Communication Association, 2001.
  • 8J, DulLe. The Question of Truth and Apologetics in a Modern/Postmodern World [J ]. http ://www. apostolic. net/biblicalstudies/apologetics. htm.
  • 9S, Mozrach, The Project of the Sociology of knowing and Cognitive Anthropology [J], http ://www.eff.org/Net- culture/Consciousness/knowing -knowing, article.
  • 10M. Klages.Postmodernism[J].http://www.colorado.edu/English/ENGL2012Klages/pomo.html.

共引文献45

同被引文献18

引证文献5

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部