摘要
文龙借对人物形象的打量,痛诋万家逐末的社会现实,相对于张竹坡对家庭的属意,文龙的批评笔触更是伸向广阔的社会。张竹坡认可“礼”的救世效用,视为鞭挞黑暗、抒发心志的武器和寄托,文龙以“礼”为参照,客观地评价了世情众生相。张竹坡与文龙就吴月娘等人物形象的驳难,寄寓彼此对时世的慨叹,灌注各自的主体精神。经世思潮、求真风尚和礼治理念,这些实践精神对张竹坡和文龙的影响强弱之别,制约着两者人物批评话语的抉择,折射出彼此所处时代及社会的变革。
Wen Long borrows his aches by judging person, fixing his mind on the society rather than on the family. Compared with Wen Long, Zhang Zhu-po regards mind as a greater weapon. The arguments on WuYue-niang, MenYu-lou and Pang Chun-mei place information and comments on the times, imbuing with their spirits. The practical spirits such as practical trends, the seeking-truth customs and the ideas of managing state affairs by etiquette reflect the divergences on JinPingmei's characters by Zhang Zhu-po and Wen Long, the changes of the times and society.
出处
《中国石油大学学报(社会科学版)》
2007年第2期83-87,共5页
Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences)