2Ahn SJ,Kim JT,Nahm DS.Cephalometric markers to consider in the treatment of Class Ⅱ Division 1 malocclusion with the bionator[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2001,119:578-86.
4De Almeida MR,Henriques JFC,Ursi W.Comparative study of the Frankel(FR-2) And bionator appliances in the treatment of Class Ⅱ malocclusion[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2002,121:458-66.
5Mills CM,McCulloch KJ.Posttreatment changes after successful correction of ClassⅡmalocclusions with the Twin Block appliance[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2000,118:24-33.
8Parkin NA,Mckeown HF,Sandler PJ.Comparison of 2 modifications of the Twin-block appliance in matched ClassⅡsamples[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2001,119:572-7.
9Trenouth MJ.Cephalometric evaluation of the Twin-block appliance in the treatment of ClassⅡDivision 1 malocclusion with matched normative growth data[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2000,117:54-9.
10Gill DS,Lee RT.Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional twin-block and Mini-block appliances:Part 1.Hard tissue changes[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2005,127:465-72.
