史学评论的价值标准

On the Value Standard of Historic Science Comment

史学评论是对历史研究的一种价值性认识和裁决,是用一定的标准对史学论著及史学现象满足社会需要程度的衡量。史学评论的价值标准不仅有政治上的和学术上的,还有逻辑的、文学的、道德的和社会的几个方面,此六项基本标准既相互区别,又彼此相联。每一部成功的史学论著,都是这样一个具有多种价值因素的有机整体,每一个价值因素都无法脱离其他价值因素而独立存在,它们由此形成的各种价值标准,独立各自担负不同的任务,共同完成史学评论的神圣使命。对史学评论的价值标准的讨论,也给了我们很大的启迪意义。一方面,要不断改善我们的知识结构,具有多方面的基本功;另一方面,要开展健康正常的史学评论,在整个史学领域,要营造一个良好的学术氛围,推动史学评论学科的繁荣和发展。

The comment of historic science （CHS） is a kind of value recognition and judge decision to historic study, a measure to the degree that historic comment works （HCW） and phenomenon meet with the social demands. The value standard of CHS not only has something of politics and academy, but also of logic, literature, moral and society that are different and connected mutually. Each successful HCW is an organic integrity that has many kinds of value factor. Each value factor cannot independently exist without others. All kinds of value standards that come into being from them independently bear different mission complete the sacred mission of CHS jointly. The discussion of the value standard of the CHS gives us great enlightening meaning. On the one hand, it is needed to improve our knowledge structure and have many kinds of basic skills; on the other hand, it is needed to carry out healthy and normal CHS, construct a good academic atmosphere to promote the prosperity and development of CHS.