西方文论在中国的“经”化——20世纪中国文论失语症的内因

On the 20th Century Literary Theory of China as the Commentary of the West Literary Theory

文章从宗经意识和“以传释经”的述学方式两个方面寻找20世纪中国文论失语的内因。本文认为,虽然传统经学已经终结,但经学余波仍然存在,在20世纪中国文论领域,这种经学余波主要表现为一种类似于经学的学术现象以及中国述学者根深蒂固的宗经意识、经学情结。在20世纪中国,述学者的宗经意识并不表现为对于中国学术传统经典的执著,而是表现为对于西方学术经典的崇拜与信仰,从而导致述学者在以西方学术经典为主要研究对象和理论依据的学术活动中沿袭了传统经学的以传释经的述学方式,这正是20世纪中国文论“失语症”发生与学术原创性匮乏的内在原因。

The study of Confucian classics was gone, but its paradigms remained. In this article, the relation between the contemporary remains of paradigms of study of Confucian classics and the lack of creativity in the 20th century literary theory of china will be discussed from two hands：one is the consciousness of regarding classic as the resource of all scholarism; the other is the mode of all scholarism the all scholars commentate classics with commentary. The article points that the remains of paradigms of study of Confucian classics is the main obstruct to contemporary literary theory of china to cure its aphasia and to begin to create its primitivity.