期刊文献+

基于DDRT-PCR研究茶树对茶尺蠖取食诱导的基因表达谱差异 被引量:10

Differential Gene Expression Profiles Analysis of Tea Plant Induced by Tea Looper (Ectropic oblique) Attack Using DDRT-PCR
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用DDRT-PCR技术初步研究了茶树被害虫茶尺蠖取食后基因表达谱差异。结果表明:接头引物A3、A4、A6、A7和A8分别与随机引物R1-R8,R12组合扩增后,总共得到222条差异片段,占总条带数的32.8%。在所鉴定的20个差异片段中,有8个片段序列没有发现同源序列;有5个片段序列与未知功能蛋白相关;其余7个差异表达的片段序列可分为6类,即分别与光合系统II色素蛋白(C15)、非生物抗性诱导蛋白(D22)、糖苷代谢酶(A45)、核酸和蛋白转录调控因子(A12,D63)、生长素调节蛋白(E94)和营养性抗虫蛋白(D73)。其中差异表达片段C15、A45、D22、D73和E94在植物与害虫相互作用相关分子机制研究中首次被发现。 DDRT-PCR technique was used to explore the differential gene expression profiles analysis of tea plant induced by tea looper (Ectropic oblique) attack. Results showed that 222 differential expression fragments were obtained, which was 32.8% of total fragments, by amplified in anchor primers A3, A4, A6, A7, A8 and random primers R1-R8, R12, respectively. Twenty fragments of which were re-amplified by RT-PCR. Based on the BLASTx search in GenBank, it were found that eight of the fragments shared no homology, five of the fragments shared homology with the unknown proteins, and seven of the fragments shared higher score homology with the known proteins, which can be divided into six groups related to photosynthetic pigment protein in photosystem Ⅱ (C15), abiotic resistance induced protein(D22), glucoside metabolism enzyme(A45), nucleic acid and protein transcription and regulation factors(A12, D63), auxin-regulated protein(E94) and VIP2 protein(D73). The fragments of C15, A45, D22, D73 and E94 were firstly found in the studies of molecular mechanism of plant-insect interaction, up to day.
出处 《茶叶科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第2期133-140,共8页 Journal of Tea Science
基金 安徽省自然科学基金(批准号050410103) 国家自然科学基金(批准号:30671331)资助
关键词 茶树 茶尺蠖 取食诱导 基因表达谱差异显示 tea plant, Ectropic oblique, damage induction, differential display for gene expression profile
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Hermsmeier D,Schittko U,Baldwin I T.Molecular Interactions between the Specialist Herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera,Sphingidae) and its natural host nicotiana attenuata.Ⅰ.large-scale changes in the accumulation of growth-and defense-related plant mRNAs[J].Plant Physiology,2001,125:683~700.
  • 2韦朝领,高香凤,江昌俊,叶爱华.基因表达谱差异显示技术及其在植物对害虫取食诱导反应研究中的应用(综述)[J].安徽农业大学学报,2006,33(1):94-99. 被引量:6
  • 3Voelcke C,Baldwin I T.Molecular Interactions between the Specialist Herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera,Sphingidae) and Its Natural Host Nicotiana attenuata:V.Microarray Analysis and Further Characterization of Large-Scale Changes in Herbivore-Induced mRNAs[J].Plant Physiol,2003,131:1877~1893.
  • 4张汉鹄.我国茶树尺蛾区系考查[J].茶叶科学,2001,21(2):157-160. 被引量:12
  • 5许宁,陈宗懋,游小清.引诱茶尺蠖天敌寄生蜂的茶树挥发物的分离与鉴定[J].昆虫学报,1999,42(2):126-131. 被引量:55
  • 6赵冬香,陈宗懋,程家安.茶树-假眼小绿叶蝉-白斑猎蛛间化学通讯物的分离与活性鉴定[J].茶叶科学,2002,22(2):109-114. 被引量:46
  • 7Hui DQ,Iqba J,Lehmann K,et al.Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca Sexta (Lepoidoptera,Sphingidae) and the nature host Nicotiana attenuata:V.Microarray analysis and further characterization oflarge-scale changes in herbivore-induced mRNAs[J].Plant Physiol,2003,131:1877~1893.
  • 8Hermsmeier D,Mazarei M,Baum TJ.Differential display analysis of the early compatible interaction between soybean and the soybean cyst nematode[J].Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions,1998,11(12):1258~1263.
  • 9Bauer D,Muller H,Reich J,et al.Identification of differentially expressed mRNA species by an improved display technique(DDRT-PCR)[J].Nucleic Acids Research,1993,21(18):4272~4280.
  • 10pursiheimo S,martinsuo P,rintamaki E,et al.Photosystem Ⅱ protein phosphorylation follows four distinctly different regulatory patterns induced by environmental cues[J].Plant,Cell and Environment,2003(26):1995~2003.

二级参考文献54

  • 1楼云芬.为害茶树的尺蠖种类及主要种的习性与防治[J].茶叶通讯,1993(3):39-41. 被引量:2
  • 2游小清,王华夫,杨亚军.茶叶中芳樟醇香叶醇及其配糖体的研究进展[J].中国茶叶,1994,16(6):5-5. 被引量:19
  • 3韩宝瑜.茶树-茶蚜-捕食、寄生性天敌间定位、取食的物理、化学通讯机制[M].杭州:中国农业科学院茶叶研究所,1999..
  • 4CHEN Zongmao, XU Ning & HAN Baoyu. Roles of volatile allelochemicals on host location of tea pests and host foraging of natural enemies in tea ecosystem[A].Proceedings of First Asia-Pacific Conference on Chemical Ecology[C]. Nov. 1-4, 1999, Shanghai, China, p.81-83.
  • 5Agelopoulos N A & Keller M A, Plant-natural enemy association in the tritropic system Cotesia rubccula-Pieris rapar-Breassicaceae (Cruciferae). I. Source of infochemicals[J]..J.Chem. Ecol.,1994, 20: 1752-1754.
  • 6Buttery R G & Ling L C. Corn leaf volatiles:identification using Tenax trapping for possible insect attractants[J]. J. Agricul. Fd. Chem., 1984, 32:1104-106.
  • 7J Bruin, M W Sabelis & M Dieke. Do plants tap SOS signals from their infested neighbours[J]. Tree, 1995,10(4): 167-169.
  • 8T C J Turlings, Bernasconi M & Bertossa R. 1998 The induction of volatile emissions in maize by three herbivore species with different feeding habits: possible consequences for their natural enemies[J]. Biological Control, 1995,11(1) 122-129.
  • 9Mattiacci L, Dicke M & Posthumus M. β-glucosidase:an elicitor of herbivore-induced plant odor that attracts host-searching parasitic wasps[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1995, 92: 2036-2040.
  • 10川上美智子, 小林彰夫, 山西贞. Characteristic Muscat flavor compounds of tea made from shoots infested with green flies: Comparative flavor analysis between Darjeeling black tea and Pomfon Oolong tea[A].Proceedings of Internat. Symp On Tea Culture and Health Sci[C]. (ISTECH): 1996 Oct. 17-19, Shizuoka, Japan, 1997,o. 125-129.

共引文献128

同被引文献274

引证文献10

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部