维和部队参训人员心理防御方式与状态-特质焦虑的相关性分析

The correlation analysis between psychological defensive style and status-trait anxiety of military personnel on peacekeeping troop of join training

目的 评估执行维和任务训练军人状态-特质焦虑与心理防御方式相关性。方法 应用状态-特质焦虑问卷（STAI）、防御方式问卷（DSQ）对136名拟执行维和任务的军人调查分析。结果 高状态焦虑23人、中等状态焦虑29人、低状态焦虑15人；高特质焦虑30人、中等特质焦虑27人、低特质焦虑21人；在特质焦虑人群中，高特质焦虑伴有高状态焦虑21人，伴有中等状态焦虑8人，伴有低水平状态焦虑1人。应用成熟防御机制平均水平为5．23，应用中间型防御机制平均水平为4．41，应用不成熟防御机制平均水平为3．55。在特质焦虑人群中，高状态焦虑伴有高特质焦虑与应用不成熟防御机制正相关，r=0．231和0．196；状态、特质焦虑与成熟防御机制负相关，r=-0．327和-0．294；在应用中间型防御机制为主的人群中焦虑水平与特质焦虑、状态焦虑无线性关系。结论 特质焦虑者心理行为反应的倾向性表现为状态焦虑，感受不愉快的情绪体验，人格特质与个体对外来刺激的心理应对方式相关。

Objective To evaluate the relationship between psychological defense style and status-trait anxiety of military personnel on peacekeeping troop. Methods Application of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory （STAI）, Defense Style Questionnaire （DSQ） to 136 soldiers to carry out peacekeeping missions investigation. Resuits There are 67 with status anxiety and 78 with trait anxiety in all 136 drivers; In severe trait anxiety group, 21 with severe status anxiety,8 with moderate status anxiety, 1 with mild status anxiety. The average level is 5.23, 4.41and 3.55 in three groups that utilize mature defense mechanisms, moderate defense mechanisms and immature defense mechanisms. In trait anxiety group, the correlation between severe trait anxiety with severe status anxiety with utilization immature defense mechanisms is positive （ r = 0. 196, 0. 231 ）. There is no linear relation between anxiety level with trait and status in moderate defense mechanisms group. Conclusion The trend of psychological behavior in trait anxiety drivers is status anxiety and unhappiness emotional experience, and there is correlation between personality trait with psychological coping style of individual on foreign stimulation.