期刊文献+

情绪调节困难量表在中国人群中的初步测试 被引量:32

Test of Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale in Chinese People
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的引进情绪调节困难量表,考察其在中国人群中的信度和效度。方法采用情绪调节困难量表对1017名大学生被试进行了测查。结果情绪调节困难量表总量表的重测信度为0.86,各分量表在0.59~0.86之间;总量表的内部一致性信度为0.89,各分量表在0.79~0.88之间。探索性因素分析的结果显示该量表为6因子结构,所有的项目在对应维度上的载荷值均大于0.4。验证性因素分析的结果显示6因子测量模型与实际数据拟合较好。结论情绪调节困难量表的信度和效度基本达到了心理测量学的要求,但仍需要进一步改进。 Objective To examine reliability and validity of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) in Chinese people. Methods DERS was administrated to 1017 college students. Results The test-retest reliability coefficients were 0. 86 for whole scale, and from 0. 59 to 0. 80 for each subscales. The a coefficients were 0. 89 for whole scale, and from 0.79 to 0. 88 for each subscales. The results of EFA showed that six factors were extracted, and factor loadings on corresponding dimensions of all items were higher than 0, 40. The results of CFA showed that six factors measurement model fit datum well. Conclusion The reliability and validity of DERS met the needs of psychometrics primarily, and the scale should have to be improved in the future studies.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2007年第4期336-340,共5页 China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词 情绪调节 情绪失调 量表 信度 效度 Emotion regulation Emotion dysregulation Scale Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition).Arlington:VA,2000
  • 2Hayes SC,Wilson KG,Gifford EV,et al.Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders:A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,1996,64(6):1152-1168
  • 3Mennin DS,Heimberg RG,Turk CL,et al.Applying an emotion regulation framework to integrative approaches to generalized anxiety disorder.Clinical Psychology.Science and Practice,2002,9(1):85-90
  • 4Cloitre M.Sexual revictimization:Risk factors and prevention.In V.M.Follette,J.I.,Ruzek,& F.R.Abueg (Eds.),Cognitive-behavioral therapies for trauma.NewYork:Guilford Press,1998:278-304
  • 5Gratz KL.Risk factors for and functions of deliberate self-harm:An empirical and conceptual review.Clinical Psychology.Science and Practice,2003,10(2):192-205
  • 6Bushman BJ,Baumeister RF,Phillips CM.Do people agree to improve their mood? Catharsis beliefs,affect regulation opportunity,and aggressive responding.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2001,81(1):17-32
  • 7Gratz KL,Roemer L.Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation:development,factor structure,and initial validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment,2004,26(1):41-54
  • 8Floyd FJ,Widaman KF.Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.Psychological Assessment,1995,7(3):286-299
  • 9Chou CP,Bentler P.Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling.In R.Hoyle (Ed.),Structure equation modeling.Concepts,issues,and applications.Newbury Park,CA:Sage,1995:37-55
  • 10Byrne BM,Shavelson RJ.Adolescent self-concept:Testing the assumption of equivalent structure across gender.American Educational Research Journal,1987,24(3):365-385

同被引文献242

引证文献32

二级引证文献147

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部