期刊文献+

论古史辨派《诗经》研究的诗学取向、价值与缺失

On the Poetic Preference,Value and Vacancy in the Study of The Book of Songs by the School of Discussion in Ancient Chinese History
下载PDF
导出
摘要 20世纪二三十年代兴起的以顾颉刚为代表的著名历史学派——古史辨以还原上古真史为目的,解构传统《诗经》学,清除历代《诗经》学萌生的伪史并查证真史。其诗学取向与价值在于,直面《诗经》本文,解除《诗经》的经典光晕,还原《诗经》的文学面目,因而对《诗经》学作了深度刷新。但是也因游走于历史与文学之间,遗失了更为细腻的历史文化密码,也对《诗经》造成了漏解、无解、误解的阐释缺失。 The School of Discussion in Ancient Chinese History represented by Gu Xiegang was a famous historical school in 1920s. They deconstructed traditional research on The Book of Songs and removed forged history for the purposes of revivifying the remote history. The School confronted the text, uncovered the veil, and reinstated The Book of Songs' literature features, which has become a classic case of modern study on The Book of Songs. The school's wavering between history and literature resulted in the missing of the subtle historical culture elements, which brought about the misunderstanding, the loss of explanation of The Book of Songs.
作者 谢中元
出处 《广东教育学院学报》 2007年第2期74-77,108,共5页 Journal of Guangdong Education Institute
关键词 古史辨 诗经 诗学取向 经典 阐释 the School of Discussion in Ancient Chinese History The Book of Songs poetic preference classic explanation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1胡适.中国哲学史大纲·导言[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社,2003.
  • 2胡适.自述古史观书[M]//古史辨(第一册).上海:上海古籍出版社,1982:22.
  • 3顾颉刚.答柳翼谋先生[M]//古史辨(第一册).上海:上海古籍出版社,1982:223.
  • 4余英时.顾颉刚、洪业和现代中国史学[M]//顾颉刚学记.上海:三联书店,37.
  • 5李吟咏.解释与真理[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2004:400.
  • 6余宝琳.诗歌的定位:早期中国文学的选集与经典[M]//北美中国古典文学研究名家十年文选.南京:江苏人民出版社,1996:276.
  • 7[古希腊] 亚里士多德.诗学[M].北京:人民文学出版社,2002:20.
  • 8顾颉刚.我的研究古史的计划[M]//古史辨(第一册).上海:上海古籍出版社,1982:214.
  • 9钱钟书.管椎篇(一)[M].北京:中华书局,1986:110.
  • 10李稚田.《诗经》研究的文化人类学猜想——兼论张岩《简论汉代以来〈诗经〉学中的误解》[J].文艺研究,1992(6):46-55. 被引量:1

二级参考文献1

共引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部