摘要
20世纪二三十年代兴起的以顾颉刚为代表的著名历史学派——古史辨以还原上古真史为目的,解构传统《诗经》学,清除历代《诗经》学萌生的伪史并查证真史。其诗学取向与价值在于,直面《诗经》本文,解除《诗经》的经典光晕,还原《诗经》的文学面目,因而对《诗经》学作了深度刷新。但是也因游走于历史与文学之间,遗失了更为细腻的历史文化密码,也对《诗经》造成了漏解、无解、误解的阐释缺失。
The School of Discussion in Ancient Chinese History represented by Gu Xiegang was a famous historical school in 1920s. They deconstructed traditional research on The Book of Songs and removed forged history for the purposes of revivifying the remote history. The School confronted the text, uncovered the veil, and reinstated The Book of Songs' literature features, which has become a classic case of modern study on The Book of Songs. The school's wavering between history and literature resulted in the missing of the subtle historical culture elements, which brought about the misunderstanding, the loss of explanation of The Book of Songs.
出处
《广东教育学院学报》
2007年第2期74-77,108,共5页
Journal of Guangdong Education Institute
关键词
古史辨
诗经
诗学取向
经典
阐释
the School of Discussion in Ancient Chinese History
The Book of Songs
poetic preference
classic
explanation