期刊文献+

中国城市公共交通行业技术效率实证研究 被引量:2

Technical Efficiency of Chinese Urban Public Transport Industry:an Empirical Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文选取1999-2004年间中国城市公共交通行业的面板数据,在Cobb-Douglas函数的基础上运用随机边界法对我国城市公共交通行业的技术效率进行了考察,并从时间、地域、交通工具类型和客运规模方面,分析了该行业的效率差异及其产生原因,旨在为该行业的未来发展和管制改革提供决策依据。研究结果表明,我国城市公共交通行业技术效率情况为:近几年虽有小幅上升,但基数总体不高;东部地区技术效率偏高;客运量大和拥有轨道交通的省市的技术效率较高。 By using the panel data of Chinese urban public transport industry over the period 1999-2004, this paper investigates the technical efficiency of the Chinese urban public transport industry through stochastic frontier approach (SFA) which is based on the Cobb-Douglas production function. This paper analyses the differences of the efficiency on time, region, vehicle kinds and scale and the reasons of these differences aimed at offering the basis of decisions on the development and the regulation reform of this industry. The results indicate that the technical efficiency of the Chinese urban public transport industry tends to ascend in recent years but with a smaller base number in the mass; the technical efficiency of Eastern China is higher; the networks which hold larger number of passengers or have subway systems have higher technical efficiency.
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSCD 2007年第2期154-158,共5页 Operations Research and Management Science
关键词 政府管制 技术效率 随机边界法 Cobb—Douglas生产函数 城市公共交通行业 government regulation technical efficiency stochastic frontier approach (SFA) Cobb-Douglas production function urban public transport industry
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献49

  • 1Farrell M J. The measurement of production efficiency[J]. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A, General, 1957,120(3):253-281.
  • 2Afriat S N. Efficiency estimation of production functions[J]. International Economic Review, 1972, 13(3):568-598.
  • 3Aigner D J, Lovell C A K, Schmidt. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production functions models[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1977, 6(1):21-37.
  • 4Battese G E, Corra G S. Estimation of a production frontier model: with application to the pastoral zone of eastern australia[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1977, 21(3):169-179.
  • 5Battese G E, Coelli T J. Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1992, 3(1/2):153-169.
  • 6Huang Y, Kalirajan K P. Enterprise Reform and Technical Efficiency of China's State-owned Enterprises[J]. Applied Economics, 1998,(3) : 585 - 592.
  • 7Battese G E, T J Coelli. A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data[J]. Empirical Economics, 1995, (20) : 325 - 332.
  • 8Battese G E, T J Coelli. Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data : with Application to Paddy Farmers in India[J]. The Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1992, (3) : 153 - 169.
  • 9植草益.产业组织论[M],卢东斌译[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1988.42.
  • 10Battese G E, Coelli T J. A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data[J]. Empirical Economics,1995,20:325-332.

共引文献169

同被引文献33

  • 1MAGNUS S. A Broad Performance Benchmark Based on Citizens Preferences [J]. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 2009, 80(4): 579-603.
  • 2WILLIAM R, ANNE Y B. Ownership, Contractual Practices and Technical Efficiency: The Case of Urban Public Transport in France [J]. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 2007, 41(2): 257-282.
  • 3OTTOZ E F G, DI G M .The Impact of Ownership on the Cost of Bus Service Provision:An Example from Italy[J]. Applied Economice, 2009, 41(3): 337-349.
  • 4ANDREA B, MARCELLA N, CARLO S. Do Competition and Ownership Matter? Evidence from Local Public Transport in Europe [EB/OL]. (2010-1 -20) [2011 -2-27] http://istituti. unicatt.it/teoria._economica_metodi_quantitativi_ 160210.pdf.
  • 5VICENTE P, LOURDES T. Analysis of the Efficiency of Local Government Services Delivery: An Application to Urban Public Transport[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2001, 35(10): 929-944.
  • 6SUZANNE L, OLGA S. Reassessing Privatization Strategies 25 Years Later: Revisiting PenT and Babitsky Comparative Performance Study of Urban Bus Transit Service[J]. Public Administration Review, 2009, 69(5 ) : 855-867.
  • 7.l F M K, BERT E. Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Infrastructures: Reconciling Private Sector Participation and Sustainability[J]. Public Administration Review, 2009, 69 (2) : 284-296.
  • 8VAND De Velde D M . Organizational Forms and Entre- preneurship in Public Transport [J]. Transport Policy, 1999, 6(3): 147-157.
  • 9MIGUEL A. Public vs Private Management of Public Utilities The Case of Urban Public Transport in Europe [J]. Research in Transportation Economics, 2008, 22( 1 ) : 85-90.
  • 10WILLIAMSON O E. Franchise Bidding for Natural Monopolies in General and with Respect to CATV [J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1976, 7(1): 73-104.

引证文献2

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部