期刊文献+

腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统阑尾切除术比较

Comparison of the laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术(laparoscopic appendectomy,LA)与传统剖腹阑尾切除术(open appendectomy,OA)的临床效果。方法回顾性分析LA组46例与同期OA组46例,比较两组平均住院费用、住院时间、切口长度、术后镇痛剂应用、术后6h开始下床活动与术后24h内肛门排气例数等临床资料。结果LA组的平均住院费、平均住院时间、切口长度与OA组比较,差异均有统计学意义(t分别=45.75、23.63和13.73,P均<0.05)。LA组的术后镇痛剂应用例数、术后6h开始下床活动例数与术后24h内肛门排气例数与OA组比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2分别=62.90、39.81和6.13,P均<0.05)。结论LA与OA比较,有手术损伤小、疼痛轻、恢复快、住院时间短等优点,而平均住院费较高。 Objective To compare the laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA) in their disadvantage and advantage. Methods Retrospective analysis was made on 46 LA cases and 46 OA cases. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared. Results Except for the average operation time, significant differences were found between the two groups in average hospitalization time, hurt of operation, rate of anodyne usage, comeback exercise and in- testine peristalsis recovering ( P 〈 0,05). Conclusions Compared with OA, LA has the advantages of little hurt, gently pain, quick recovery and short hospitalization.
出处 《全科医学临床与教育》 2007年第2期129-130,133,共3页 Clinical Education of General Practice
关键词 阑尾炎 腹腔镜 阑尾切除术 appendicitis laparoscope appendectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献3

  • 1[1]AWARAL J F. The experimental development of an ultrasonically activated scalpel for laparoscopic use [ J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1996, 4(2): 92~99.
  • 2[2]LEE L S, JOHN L P. Laparoscopic control of short gastric vessels[J] . J Am College Surgeons, 1995, 181: 347~355.
  • 3[3]KRUDOWSKI Z H. Preenting wound infection after appendectomy[J]. Br J surg, 1988, 25: 1 023~1 026.

共引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部