一概否定中国“风水”?

Chinese Fengshui To Be All Denied?

“风水”作为中国建筑“文脉”的载体是十分明显的。中国“风水”的延续应以转型为前提。所谓“转型,”一方面指“风水”在延续中要尽力剔除其中的迷信因素;另一方面,“风水”的延续也要借鉴借助于当代科学,提升自己的科学品位。目前,要谋划建立发展有中国特色的“风水哲学”、“风水美学”、“风水诗学”、“风水景观学”、“风水地理学”、“风水建筑学”、“风水规划学”、“室内风水学”、“风水心理学”、“风水微气候学”、“人体风水学”等学科。陈志华教授和李申教授发文对“风水”全盘否定。我理解两位教授对以“风水之名大贩迷信者的愤怨之情,但是,我又不同意二位教授一概否定“风水”的思路。

It is obvious that＂Fengshui＂has found its way as the carrier of the context into Chinese architecture.The continuation of Chinese ＂Fengshui＂should be preconditioned by conversion. By the socalled＂conversion＂,we mean that, on the one hand, the superstitious elements in ＂Fengshou＂should be removed,and,on the other hand, the continuation of ＂Fengshui＂should be based on modem science so as to promote its status. At present, we should take into consideration of the establishment of ＂Fengshui Philosophy＂,＂Fengshui Aesthetics＂,＂Fengshui Poetics＂,＂Fengshui Landscape Aesthetics＂,＂Fengshui Geography＂,＂Fengshui Architecture＂,＂Fengshui Programming＂, ＂Indoor Fengshui＂,＂Fengshui Psychology＂, ＂Fengshui Micro-Climatology＂ and ＂Body Fengshui＂ that are characterized with Chinese tradition. Professor Chen Zhihua and Professor Li Shen argue in their articles that ＂Fengshui＂should all be denied, which I can understand.They are indignant at those who take advantages of the superstitious elements in＂Fengshui＂ for their own good. However, I disagree upon their ideas that everything about ＂Fengshui＂ should be denied.