期刊文献+

《药物分析》考试试卷分析 被引量:3

Analysis of the Examination Paper of "Pharmaceutical Analysis"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估我校药学系2002级药学专业药物分析期末考试试卷的质量,为改进药物分析教学方法和提高考试试卷质量提供依据。方法运用教育测量学原理与教育统计学方法对试题进行统计分析。结果学生成绩呈正态分布,平均分70.2分,标准差13.9分,平均难度0.70,区分度0.73,信度0.76,效度0.87。结论本次考试的学生成绩呈正态分布,试题难度适中,区分度良好,试卷可信、有效。 Objective To evaluate the final examination paper of "Pharmaceutical Analysis" for year 2002 students of pharmacology major in our school and to provide basis for improving "Pharmaceutical Analysis" teaching methods and the quality of examination papers. Methods The examination papers were analyzed with the principles of educational measurement and educational statistics. Results The scores were normally distributed, with the average score being 70.2 points and standard deviation being 13.9 points. The average difficulty and discrimination were 0.70 and 0, 73, respectively. The reliability was 0.76 and the validity was 0.87. Conclusion The students' test scores were shown as a normal distribution, This test is reliable and valid because it has moderate difficulty and satisfactory discrimination.
出处 《西北医学教育》 2007年第3期464-465,共2页 Northwest Medical Education
基金 西安交通大学2004年本科教学改革研究项目
关键词 药物分析 试卷 统计分析 pharmaceutical analysis examination paper statistical analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献6

  • 1苏金明 傅荣华 周建斌 等.统计软件SPSS for Windows实用指南[M].北京:电子工业出版,2001..
  • 2王文杰.概率论与数理统计[M].武汉:华中理工大学出版社,1993..
  • 3林杰斌 陈湘 刘明德.SPSS11统计分析实物设计宝典[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2002..
  • 4盛骤 谢式千 潘承毅.概率论与数理统计[M].高等教育出版社,1997..
  • 5丘祥兴主编.高等医学教育的理论与实践[M].上海:上海医科大学出版社,1993.
  • 6李皓桓,张国忠.医学教育中的动机──理论如何指导实践[J].国外医学(医学教育分册),2000,21(3):40-41. 被引量:7

共引文献28

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部