熟练Web用户的搜索行为:关注控制与情感控制的影响被引量：6

Experienced Web Users' Search Behavior: Effects of Focus and Emotion Control

下载PDF

导出

摘要本研究调查了作为熟练Web用户的67位本科生的认知特征与情感特征对其Web导航及搜索行为的影响。在研究中,两个标准化测验和一个调查问卷用于收集参与者的认知方式、问题解决方式以及基本资料。通过对调查对象在团体镶嵌图形测验和问题解决问卷两个标准化测试中获得的分数进行因素分析,作者抽取了2个用户因素,即关注控制和情感控制。其中,关注控制因素似乎能影响用户导航行为(如链接和后退键的使用),而情感控制因素不仅影响包括关键词搜索等搜索行为,还影响以查准率和查全率等为指标的检索绩效。 This study investigates how users＇ cognitive and affective characteristics influence the navigational and search behaviors on the Web among experienced Web users. Sixty-seven undergraduate students participated in the studv. Two standardized tests and a questionnaire were used to eollect information on the participants＇cognitive style. problem-solving style, and demographics. Factor analvsis formed on the scores from the two standardized tests （Group Embedded Figures Test and Problem Solving Inventory）, and extracted two user factors （Focus Control and Emotion Control）. The Focus Control factor seemed to influence users＇ navigational behaviors, such as the use of links and back buttons, whereas the Emotion Control factor affected search behaviors including kevword searching, and also search performance measured by precision and recall.

作者 Kyung-Sun Kim 杨玉芹焦建利

机构地区美国威斯康辛大学麦迪逊校区图书馆与信息研究学院华南师范大学教育信息技术学院

出处《远程教育杂志》 2007年第2期31-34,共4页 Journal of Distance Education

关键词网络搜索行为认知风格关注控制情感控制 Web search behavior Cognitive style Focus Control Emotion Control

分类号 G250.73 [文化科学—图书馆学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1[1]Allen,B.L.,& Kim,K.S.(2001).Person and context in information seeking:Interactions between cognitive and task variables.Paper presented at the conference Information Seeking in Context:ISIC2000,G?teborg,Swoden.Bandura,A.(1977).Self efficacy:Toward a unifying theory of behaviour change.Psychological Review,84,191-215.
2[2]Bilal.D.(2000).Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine:I.Cognitive,physical,and affective behaviors on factbased search tasks.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,51(7),646-665.
3[3]Brown,M.E.(1991).A general-model of information-seeking behavior.Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting,28,9-14.
4[4]Ellis,D.,Ford,N.,& Wood,F.(1993).Hypertext and learning styles.The Electronic Libmry,11(1),13-18.
5[5]Fitzgerald,G.,& Semrau,L (1998).The effects of learner differences on usage patterns and learning outcomes with hypermedia case studies.Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia,7(4),309-332.
6[6]Foltz,P.W.(1996).Comprehension,coherence,and strategies in hypertext and linear text.In Rouet,J-F.Et al.
7[7](Eds.),Hypertext and cognition.(pp.109-136).Mahwah,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8[8]Ford,N.,& Chen,S.Y.(2000).Individual differences,hypermedia navigation,and learning:an empirical study.Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia,9(4),282-311.
9[9]Ford,N.,Wood,F.,& Walsh,C.(1994).Cognitive styles and searching.Online and CD-ROM Review,18(2),79-86.
10[10]Georgia Institute of Technology (1998).Graphic,Visualization,& Usability Center's (GVU)1Oth WWW User