期刊文献+

艺术的自律和研究的自蔽——关于书法史研究的思考

Art's autonomy and Study's Selfenclosure___Thoughts on Study of Calligraphy History
下载PDF
导出
摘要 艺术的自律概念的提出,从某种意义上是人们艺术观念逐步形成,艺术逐步发展的必然。在我们理解和研究艺术中有一定的历史和现实价值,但这种艺术的自律观念,导致了当代书法史研究的自蔽。因为书法史并不是一个仅仅“为艺术而艺术”的发展史;同时,研究的过分专业化和独立化,也使得书法与其他事物之间本来所具有的天然联系被人为地割裂开来,从而限制了专业研究的发展、局限了研究者的视野。 The raising of the concept “art autonomy” is the inevitable result of the form of people's idea about art and the development of art. It has certain historical and realistic value for us to understand and study art. This thesis thinks that art autonomy also leads the research of calligraphy art into self-enclosure because calligraphy history is not just a history about “art for art's sake”. At the same time, the professionalized and individualized research separates calligraphy from other art forms, so as limits the development of the research of calligraphy and circles the vision of researchers.
作者 李彤
出处 《南京艺术学院学报(美术与设计)》 北大核心 2007年第2期42-44,共3页 Journal of Nanjing Arts Institute:Fine Arts & Design
关键词 书法艺术 自律 书法史研究 自蔽 art of calligraphy autonomy research on calligraphy history self-enclose
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献50

  • 1Peter Btirger, Theory of the Avant-Garde, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984, pp. 35-54. pp. 47-49, p. 53.
  • 2Raymond Williams, Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society, New York : Oxford University Press, 1976,pp. 40 - 41.
  • 3Wladyslaw Tatarkiewicz, A History of Six Ideas, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1980, p. 23.
  • 4“Origins of Aesthetics,”by Paul Oskar Kristeller,Encyclopedia of Aeshetics,1998.
  • 5“A utonomy:Historical Overview”,by Casey Haskins,Encyclopedia ofAesthetics,1998.
  • 6H. H. Herth & C. W. Mills, eds. , From Max Weber:Essays in Sociology, New York: Oxford University Press,1946, p. 341.
  • 7Pierre Bourdieu, The Field of Cultural Production, Cambridge: Polity, 1992, p. 115.
  • 8Quoted in Peter Burger, Theory of the Avant-Garde, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984, p. 24.
  • 9Pierre Bourdieu, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984.
  • 10Harold Perkin,The Rise of Professional Society,London:Routtedge,1989.

共引文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部