期刊文献+

兔与大鼠十二指肠回肠粘膜上皮及固有层淋巴细胞分布的比较 被引量:1

Comparison of iLEL and PL distributing in the duodenum and ileum between rabbit and Wistar rat
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究不同动物十二指肠和回肠黏膜上皮、固有层内淋巴细胞分布的差异,为不同饮食条件下消化道的免疫提供资料。方法取健康兔W istar大鼠十二指肠和回肠,分别将其分为上、中、下段,显微镜下观察并计数黏膜上皮及固有层中淋巴细胞数量。结果兔与大鼠十二指肠绒毛上皮内的淋巴细胞(iIEL)各段间均存在显著差异,分别为上段P<0.05,中段P<0.01,下段P<0.01;回肠固有层内淋巴细胞(PL)各段间也存在显著差异,分别为上段P<0.01,中段P<0.05,下段P<0.05。兔与大鼠回肠各段iIEL均存在显著差异,分别为上段P<0.01,中段P<0.05,下段P<0.05;上、中段PL分布也存在差异,分别为上段P<0.05,中段P<0.01。结论兔与大鼠十二指肠和回肠的iLEL与PL分布情况具有显著性差异,这种差异与小肠的结构及食物不同有关。 Objective :To study the distributing difference of iIEI (intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes ) and PL (propria lymphocytes ) in the duodenum and ileum of rabbits and Wistar rats and to provide data for the enteroimmunity, of digestive tract. Methods: The healthy rabbits and Wistar rats were used in the study. The duodenum and ileum were evenly cut into three parts, the upper, middle and lower parts. The number in iIEL and PL were counted under the microscope. Results: There was remarkable difference among the different portions in the duodenum and ileum of the rabbits and rats : in the duodenum's iIEL, the upper part P 〈 0. 05, the middle part P 〈 0. 01, the lower part P 〈 0. 01 ; to the duodenum's PL, the upper P 〈0. 01, the middle P 〈0. 05, and the lower P 〈 0.05. in the ileum's iIEL,the upper part P 〈 0. 01, the middle part P 〈 0. 05, the lower part P 〈 0.05 ; PL the upper P 〈 0. 05, the middle P 〈 0. 01. Conclusion: The iIEL and PL distributing difference exists in the duodenum and ileum of the two kinds of animals, which has certain relationship with the structure of the small intestine and their food.
机构地区 泰山医学院
出处 《泰山医学院学报》 CAS 2006年第5期399-401,共3页 Journal of Taishan Medical College
基金 泰山医学院资助课题NO.2005ZR14
关键词 WISTAR大鼠 十二指肠 回肠 淋巴细胞 rabbit Wistar rat duodenum ileum lymphocyte
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献28

  • 1Beagley KW,Husband AJ.Intraepithelial, lymphocyte:origins,distribution,and function.Crit Rev Immunol,1998,18(3):237~254.
  • 2Anne Ferguson.lntraepithelial lymphocytes of the small intestine.Gut,1977,18:921~937.
  • 3Machado CS M,et al.Assessment of gut intraepithelial lymphocytes during late gestation and neonatal period.Biol Neonate 1994,66(6):324~329.
  • 4Santhi G,et al.Intestinal mucosal immune response in experimental vitamin A deficiency:Reduction in helper T cell. J Nutr Immunol, 1994,2(4):29~38.
  • 5Nilssen DE,Halstensen TS,et al.Distribution and phenetypes of duodenal M intraepithelial g/d T cells in patients with various types of primary B-cell deficiency.Clin Immunol lmmunopathol 1993,68(3):301~310.
  • 6Hayday A,Theodoridis E,Ramsburg E,et al.Intraepithelial lymphocytes: exploring the third way in immunology.Nat lmmunol 2001 Nov,2(1 1):997~1003.
  • 7Abul KA, Andrew HL, Jordan SP. Cellular and Molecular Immunology. Philadelphia: W.B.Saunders Company, 2000.
  • 8Buzoni-Gatel D, Debbabi H, Moretto M, et al. Intraepithelial lymphocytes traffic to the intestine and enhance resistance to Toxoplasma gondii oral infection. J Immunol, 1999, 162(10):5846-5852.
  • 9Chai JY, Guk SM, Han HK, et al. Role of intraepithelial lymphocytes in mucosal immune responses of mice experimentally infected with Cryptosporidium parvum. J Parasitol,1999,85(2): 234-239.
  • 10Lepage AC, Buzoni-Gatel D, Bout DT, et al. Gut-derived intraepithelial lymphocytes induce long term immunity against Toxoplasma gondii. J Immunol, 1998, 161(9): 4902-4908.

共引文献31

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部