三段论、私法自治与哲学诠释学——对朱庆育博士的一个反驳

The Syllogism, the Autonomy of Private Law and the Philosophical Hermeneutics: A Critique for Dr. Zhu qingyu

私法自治或意思自治并非民法追求的唯一目标。民法所关心的毋宁是多种价值的协调共存。同时,法律效果来源于法律规范这一事实与私法自治并没有必然的冲突,相反,法律规范往往是私法自治的保障。哲学诠释学有特定的理论预设和论证目标,它对民法学的意义在于其提供了一种思考问题的立场和反思能力,而不是方法论。因此,用游戏概念来阐述意思表示的解释过程并没有规范性的内容,也不能更好地促进私法自治。

What the civil law pursuits is not only the autonomy of private law or private autonomy, rather the harmonized coexistence of many different values. Meanwhile, the fact that the legal effect comes from the provision of positive law does not necessarily collide with the autonomy of private law. On the contrary, the provisions of positive law are often the safeguard of the autonomy of private law. Secondly, the philosophical hermeneutics has its given theory expectation and objective of argumentation, so, what it provides for the civil law is a reflection ability and standpoint of considering problem, not methodology. Consequently, the theory that elucidates the process of the intention expression interpretation with the concept of game does not have normative contents, and does not promote the autonomy of private law better.