期刊文献+

“税收协定优于国内税法适用”不可绝对化 被引量:1

Tax Treaties Are Not Absolutely Prior to Domestic Tax Laws
原文传递
导出
摘要 《中华人民共和国外商投资企业和外国企业所得税法》和《中华人民共和国税收征收管理法》规定,在国内税法与税收协定发生冲突的情况下,优先适用税收协定。①但是这一规定过于绝对化,在大多数情况下,我们应该善意履行国际义务,遵守税收协定的规定,但是,如果国内税法的规定能够维护本国税收利益,打击国际逃避税,或者国内税法给跨国纳税人带来的利益优于税收协定给跨国纳税人带来的利益,则国内税法可以优先于税收协定适用。 According to Income Tax Law of the People rs Republic of China for Enterprises with Foreign Investment and Foreign Enterprises and Law of the Peoplers Republic of China Concerning the Administration of Tax Collection, when domestic tax laws conflict with tax treaties, tax treaties shall have the priority. This article argues that the application of this rule should not be over-emphasized. In most of the cases, we should fulfill our international obligations in good faith and comply with tax treaties. However, if domestic tax laws can defend national tax benefits, crack down against international tax evasion and tax avoidance, or if the transnational taxpayers can benefit more from domestic tax laws than from tax treaties, domestic tax laws may take priority over tax treaties.
作者 邵朱励
出处 《涉外税务》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第5期57-61,共5页 International Taxation In China
关键词 税收协定 国内税法 冲突 Tax treaty Domestic tax law Conflict
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献28

  • 1廖益新.避免双重征税协定与国内税法的关系[J].涉外税务,1995(11):19-21. 被引量:5
  • 2刘永伟.税收优惠违反国民待遇原则悖论——兼谈我国外商投资企业税收政策的选择[J].现代法学,2006,28(2):157-165. 被引量:3
  • 3邓正来编.《王铁崖文选》.中国政法大学出版社,2003年版,第9-10页.
  • 4SANBLER, DANIEL, Tax Treaties and Controlled Foreign Company Legislation: Pushing the Boundaries (2)[M], The Hague/ London/Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1998, 43.
  • 5ARNOLD, B.J. Tax Treaties and Fax Avoidance: The 2003 Revisions to the Commentary to the OECD Model [J], Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation, 2004, 58(6): 253,
  • 6Bricom Holdings Lid, v, IRC [1997] STC 1179 (CA),
  • 7Appeal No. 232 276, Conseil d'é tat. 28 June 2002,
  • 8KHO: 2002:26, Supreme Administrative Court, 28 March 2002,
  • 9WEEGHEL, VAN. The Improper Use of Tax Treaties [M]. Boston, The Hague, London: Kluwer Law International. 1998.
  • 10JIM é NEZ.A. J,M, Domestic Anti-Abuse Rules and Double Taxation Treaties: a Spanish Perspective- Part I [J].Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation, 2002, 56 (11): 543.

共引文献10

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部