期刊文献+

基于优先级的超协调本体推理研究

The Study of Reasoning about Inconsistent Ontology with Priorities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着语义Web研究的逐步深入,本体推理问题业已受到众多相关人员的重视。而超协调本体的推理问题,作为本体维护以及本体集成的研究基础,更是迫切地有待解决。本文对本体知识库作出了一定的扩充,定义了基于优先级的本体知识库的一系列相关概念,并且在此基础上,给出了两种在超协调的本体中寻求一致性推理的途径,希望能为相关的研究带来一定的参考与借鉴。 Reasoning with inconsistency is a welbknown topic in logics and AI. Several approaches have been proposed to deal with inconsistent ontology in current Semantic Web researches. The objective of this paper is to propose solutions for handling conflicts of inconsistency with an assumption of prioritized knowledge base. We have introduced the formal definitions of the prioritized knowledge base of ontology, and investigated the strategies of inconsistency reasoning processing based on the priority.
出处 《计算机科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第4期137-139,共3页 Computer Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(60403027) 湖北省自然科学基金项目(2005ABA258) 软件工程国家重点实验室开放基金项目(SKLSE05-07)资助
关键词 本体 推理 非一致性 优先级 Ontology, Reasoning, Inconsistency, Priority
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Schlobach S,Cornet R.Non-standard reasoning services for the debugging of description logic terminologies.In:Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'03),Acapulco,Mexico,August 2003.355~362
  • 2董明楷,蒋运承,史忠植.一种带缺省推理的描述逻辑[J].计算机学报,2003,26(6):729-736. 被引量:52
  • 3Huang Z,Harmelen F,Teije A.Reasoning with Inconsistent Ontologies.In:Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'05),Edinburgh,Scotland,August 2005.454~459
  • 4Benferhat S,Garcia L.Handling locally stratified inconsistent knowledge bases.Studia Logica,2002.77~104
  • 5Lang J,Marquis P.Removing inconsistencies in assumption-based theories through knowledge-gathering actions.Studia Logica,2001.179~214
  • 6Marquis P,Porquet N.Resource-bounded paraconsistent inference.Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence,2003.349~384

二级参考文献11

  • 1Baader F, et al. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory,Implementation and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • 2Brachman R J, Schmolze J G. An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science, 1985, 9(2): 171-216.
  • 3Schmidt-Schauβ M, Smolka G. Attributive concept descriptions with complements. Artificial Intelligence, 1991, 48(1) : 1-26.
  • 4Reiter R. A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence,1980, 13(1): 81-132.
  • 5McCarthy J. Circumscription-A form of non-monotonic reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 1980, 13(1): 27-39.
  • 6Brewka G. Nonmonotonic Reasoning- Logical Foundations of Commonsense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
  • 7Baader F, Hullunder B. Embedding defaults into terminological representation systems. Journal of Automated Reasoning,1995, 14(1): 149-180.
  • 8Baader F, Hollunder B. Priorities on defaults with prerequisites, and their application in treating specificity in terminological default logic. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 1995, 15(1): 41-68.
  • 9Haarslev V, Moeller R, Turhan A Y, Wessel M. On terminological default reasoning about spatial information: Extended abstract. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Description Logics (DL' 99), Linkoping, Sweden, 1999. 155-159.
  • 10Lambrix P, Shahmehri N, Wahlloef N. A default extension to description logics for use in an intelligent search engine. In:Proceedings of the 31st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Volume V - Modeling Technologies and Intelligent Systems Track, Hawaii, 1998. 28-35.

共引文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部