期刊文献+

基于CWM的元数据的形式化推理框架研究 被引量:1

A Formal Framework for Reasoning on Metadata Based on CWM
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在基于公共仓库元模型(CWM)建立元数据的过程中,参与建立元数据的团体的不同经验以及描述数据的不同视角不可避免地带来元数据的冲突和冗余等问题,然而CWM的图形化特点使之缺乏精确的语义,所以如何在其上进行推理以自动发现这些问题至今没有得到很好的解决.研究了利用描述逻辑——一个一阶谓词逻辑的可判定子集形式化CWM元模型和元数据并进行推理的方法,将一致性检测分为水平一致性和演化一致性分别处理,在处理演化一致性的过程中对CWM元模型进行了扩展,使之支持元数据的版本能力从而能够推理由于演化引起的不一致问题,然后利用推理引擎LOOM对两种情形进行推理检测以发现不一致信息,取得了令人满意的结果,表明提出的方法是可行的. During the metadata creation based on common warehouse metamodel (CWM), the different experiences and views of describing data of organizations involved in metadata creation cause some problems inevitably, such as inconsistencies and redundancies. However, reasoning on CWM metadata for automatically detecting these problems is difficult because CWM metamodel and metadata are rendered to users by graphs, which lack precise semantics. In this paper, an approach is proposed to formalize and reason on CWM metamodel and metadata in terms of a logic belonging to description logics, which are subsets of first-order logic. First, according to the specialities of CWM metamodel and metadata, description logic DLid which supports identification constraints on concepts is proposed. Then consistency is distinguished into horizontal consistency and evolution consistency. Towards evolution consistency, CWM metamodel is extended with version capabilities so that reasoning about inconsistency caused by evolution can be done and then the formalization of CWM metamodel and metadata into DLid knowledge base for horizontal consistency checking and evolution consistency checking is studied. Finally, reasoning engine LOOM is applied to check consistency for the above two situations, and the results are encouraging. The approach can be exploited for developing intelligent system that supports automated reasoning on CWM metadata, so as to provide support for the development of the components of data warehouse systems, thus improving the reliability of metadata integration and data warehouse system.
出处 《计算机研究与发展》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2007年第5期829-836,共8页 Journal of Computer Research and Development
基金 航空科学基金项目(01I52058)~~
关键词 公共仓库元模型(CWM) 描述逻辑 元数据集成 元数据演化 水平一致性 演化一致性 common warehouse metamodel(CWM) description logic metadata integration metadata evolution horizontal consistency evolution consistency
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Object Management Group. Common Warehouse Metamodel (CWM) Specification, Version 1.1 [OL]. http://www. omg. org. 2001.
  • 2John Poole, Dan Chang, Douglas Tolbert, et al. Common Warehouse Metamodel Developer's Guide [M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2003.
  • 3F Baader, D McGuinness, D Nardi, et al. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • 4David Brill. LOOM Reference Manual, Version 2.0 [OL]. http://www. isi. edu/isd/LOOM/documentation/reference2. 0oneside. ps. 1993.
  • 5Volker Haarslev, Ralf Moller. RACER system description [ C]. The Int'l Joint Conf on Automated Reasoning( IJCAR 2001 ), Siena, Italy, 2001.
  • 6Ian Horrocks. FaCT and iFaCT. International Workshop on Description Logics(DL99), Linkoping, Sweden, 1999.
  • 7Diego Calvanese, Giuseppe De Giacomo, Maurizio Lenzerini. Identification constraints and functional dependencies in description logics [C]. The 17th Int'l Joint Conf on Artificial Intelligence(IJCAI 2001 ), Washington, 2001.
  • 8Robert MacGregor. Inside the LOOM description classifier [J ]. SIGART Bull, 1991, 2(3) : 88-92.
  • 9Barton Jane, Currier Sarah, Hey Jessie M N. Building quality assurance into metadata creation: An analysis based on the learning objects and e-prints communities of practice [C]. The 2003 Dublin Core Conference: Supporting Communities of Discourse and Practice-Metadata Research and Applications (DCMI), Seattle, Washington, 2003.
  • 10Randall Hauch, Alex Miller, Rob Cardwell. Information intelligence: Metadata for information discovery, access, and integration [C]. The 2005 ACM SIGMOD Int'l Conf on Management of Data, Baltimore, USA, 2005.

同被引文献10

  • 1CRISP-DM. CRoss industry standard process for data mining [EB/OL]. (Auguest, 2000) [2007-7-28] http://www, crispdm. org, 2007.
  • 2DMG. PMML version 3. 1, in data mining group [EB/OL]. (December, 2005 )[2007-7-28] http://www. dmg, org/index. html 2005.
  • 3Object Management Group. Common warehouse metamodel specification, version 1.1[EB/OL]. (March, 2003) [2007-7-28] http://www, omg. org, 2001.
  • 4Hauch R, Miller A, Cardwell R. Information intelligence: metadata for information discovery, aecess, and integration [C]. the 2005 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. Baltimore, USA,2005,793-798.
  • 5Call A, Calvanese D, Giacomo G D. A formal framework for reasoning on UML class diagrams[C], the 13th International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems (ISMIS'02), Lyon, France, 2002, 503-513.
  • 6Evans A S. Reasoning with UML class diagrams[C]. the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Industrial Strength Formal Specification Techniques(WIFT98), Boca Raton, USA, 1998, 102-113.
  • 7Zubcoff J, Trujillo J. Conceptual modeling for classification mining in data warehouses [C]. the 8th International Conference on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery (DaWaK 2006), Cracow, Poland, 2006, 566-575.
  • 8Castellano M, Pastore N, Arcieri F, et al. A model-view-controller Architecture for knowledge discovery[C].the 5th International Conference on Data Mining, Malaga, Spain, 2004.
  • 9Calvanese D, Giacorno G D, Lenzerini M. Identification constraints and functional dependencies in description logics[C]. the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2001), Washington, 2001, 155-160.
  • 10Horrocks I, Sattler U. A tableaux decision procedure for SHOIQ[C]. the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2005), 2005.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部