期刊文献+

多焦点人工晶状体植入术后早期双眼视觉分析 被引量:9

Study of binocular function in early stage after implantation of multifocai intraocular lens
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究多焦点人工晶状体(MIOL)植入术后早期患者的双眼视觉恢复情况。方法31例(46只眼)白内障患者植入MIOL作为MIOL组,其中单眼手术16例,设为Ms组,双眼手术15例,设为Md组。32例(47只眼)白内障患者植入单焦点人工晶状体(SIOL)作为SIOL组,其中单眼手术17例,设为Ss组,双眼手术15例,设为Sd组。术后3周,观察患者的双眼视觉即同视功能、融合功能及远、近距离立体视功能及视力、视觉症状等。结果全部患者具有良好的同视功能及融合功能,两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。具有远距离立体视功能者MIOL组占38.7%(12/31),SIOL组占40.6%(13/32),两组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。具有近距离立体视功能者MIOL组占41.9%(13/31),SIOE组占15.6%(5/32),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P〉0.05)。Ms与Md、Ss与Sd比较远、近距离立体视功能差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。仅2例(6.5%)单眼植入MIOL患者诉夜间出现眩光症状,其他患者均无明显不适,满意程度较高。MIOL组80.6%(25/31)、SIOL组56.2%(18/32)患者诉用餐夹菜、冲热水壶、上下楼梯等立体视觉明显改善,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论MIOL植入术后早期患者立体视功能已达到老年人正常水平;且单眼与双眼植入立体视功能恢复相当。近距离立体视功能MIOL组较SIOL组恢复快。MIOL在为患者提供良好的全程视力及立体视功能方面具有明显优势。 Objective To evaluate binocular function in the early stage after implantation of multifocal intraocular lens. Methods Three weeks postoperatively, simultaneous perception, fusion, near and far-distance stereoacuity, visual acuity and visual symptoms were observed in 31 cases (46 eyes) with mulfifocal intraocular lens implantation (MIOL) [ MIOL group, in which 16 cases with unilateral implantation (Ms) and 15 cases with bilateral implantation (Md)] and 32 cases (47 eyes) with single- focal intraocular lens implantation(SIOL) [ SIOL group, in which 17 cases with unilateral implantation (Ss) and 15 cases with bilateral implantation (Sd) ]. Results All patients obtained simultaneous perception and fusion sense, there was no significantly statistical difference between these two group ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Foveal far-distance stereoacuity was established in 38.7% cases among MIOL group( 12/31 )and 40.6% in SIOL group (13/32), with no statistically significant difference between these two groups (P 〉 0. 05 ). Foveal near-distance stereoacuity was established in 41.9% MIOL cases ( 13/31 ) and in 15.6% SIOL group (5/32) , the difference was statistically significant ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Foveal near and far-distance stereoacuity of either Ms and Md or Ss and Sd revealed no significantly statistical difference ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Two patients (6.5%) with MIOL in only one eye complained glare at night, others were satisfied. The stereopsis visual performance such as the quality of vision during eating, up-and-down stairs was improved in MIOL group [ 80. 6% (25/31) ] and in SIOL group [ 56. 2% (18/32) 1, the difference was statistically significant (P 〈 0. 05). Conclusions There is a complete recovery of binocular vision in the early post-operative stage of MIOL implantation as compared with the normal value of aged people. Foveal near and far-distance stereoacuity after bilateral and unilateral implantation of either MIOL or SIOL revealed no statistically significant difference. Foveal near-distance stereopsis acuity of MIOL group was improved more quickly than that of SIOL group. MIOL has distinct advantage in providing whole-distance visual acuity and stereoacuity.
出处 《中华眼科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第5期407-411,共5页 Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology
关键词 晶体 人工 白内障 视觉 双眼 Lenses,intraocular Cataract Vision,binocular
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1毕宏生,马晓华,蔡宛亭,王兴荣,陈伟,刘冬梅,解孝锋.多焦点人工晶状体的临床应用研究[J].中华眼科杂志,2004,40(6):385-388. 被引量:14
  • 2Leyland M, Zinicola E. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review. Ophthalmology,2003,110 : 1789-1798.
  • 3刘海峰 许澍翔 马萍 等.老年人立体视觉的检查与分析[J].中华眼科杂志,1996,32:288-290.
  • 4王利华,龚鹏基.视锐度降低对立体视锐度的影响[J].中华眼科杂志,1990,26(2):76-79. 被引量:35
  • 5Rosen ES. Binocular vision? J Cataract Refract Surg, 2001,27:1529-1530.
  • 6Georg H, Alrun G,Jurgen H, et al. Stereoacuity and aniseikonia after unilateral implantation of the Array refractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1999,25 : 1151-1156.
  • 7Javitt JC, Steinert RF. Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular functional, and quality-of-llife outcomes.Ophthalmology ,2000,107:2040-2048.
  • 8李风鸣.眼科全书[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.124-168.
  • 9Leyland M, Zinicola E. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lens in cataract surgery. A System Review. Ophthalmology,2003,110 : 1789-1798.
  • 10Montes-Mico R, Charman WN. Choice of special frequency for contrast sensitivity evaluation after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg,2001,17 :646-651.

二级参考文献8

  • 1刘家琦,儿童弱视,1983年
  • 2Brydon KW,Tokarewicz AC,Nichols BD.AMO array multifocal lens versus monofocal correction in cataract surgery.J Cataract Refract Surg,2000,26:96-100.
  • 3Steinert RF,Aker BL,Trentacost DJ,et al.A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens.Ophthalmology,1999,106:1243-1255.
  • 4Vaquero Ruano M,Encinas JL,Millan I,et al.AMO array multifocal bersus monofocal intraocular lenses:long-term follow-up.J Cata ract Refract Surg,1998,24:118-123.
  • 5Negishi K,Nagamoto T,Hara E,et al.Clinical evaluation of a fivezone refractive refractive multifocal intraocular lens.J Cataract Refract Surg,1996,22:110-115.
  • 6Weghaupt H,Pieh S,Skorpik C.Comparison of pseudoaccommodation and visual quality between a diffractive and refracyive multifocal intraocular lens.J Cataract Refract Surg,1998,24:663-665.
  • 7Weghaupt H,Pieh S,Skorpik C.Visual properties of the foldable Array multifocal intraocular lens.J Cataract Refract Surg,1996,22(Suppl 2):1313.
  • 8Ravalico G,Parentin F,Baccara F.Effect of astigmatism on multifocal intraocular lenses.J Cataract Refract Surg,1999,25:110-115.

共引文献214

同被引文献87

引证文献9

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部