期刊文献+

人工流产术中不同镇痛药物复合靶控输注异丙酚麻醉的效果——多中心研究 被引量:23

Different opioids combined with target-controlled infusion of propofol for artificial abortion: a multicenter study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较人工流产术患者瑞芬太尼、芬太尼及舒芬太尼复合靶控输注异丙酚麻醉的安全性和有效性。方法采用前瞻性、多中心、开放、随机分组、对照研究的方法。4个研究中心共选择390例行人工流产手术患者,随机分为3组:芬太尼单次静脉注射组(F组,n=134)、瑞芬太尼血浆靶控输注组(R组,n=120)和舒芬太尼单次静脉注射组(S组,n=136),分别复合异丙酚血浆靶控输注行全身麻醉,记录起效时间、恢复时间、准确定向时间、术中体动(程度和次数)、镇痛效果、呼吸抑制评分和HR、MAP、SpO2及术后并发症的发生情况等。结果3组间麻醉起效时间和准确定向力时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),R组麻醉恢复时间长于F组和S组(P<0.01),R组异丙酚总用量、术中最低SpO2、术中体动次数及术后恶心呕吐、嗜睡的例数均低于F组和S组(P<0.05或0.01),R组呼吸抑制评分高于F组和S组(P<0.01)。结论与芬太尼和舒芬太尼相比,瑞芬太尼复合异丙酚靶控输注麻醉用于人工流产手术镇痛效果更好,但其呼吸抑制作用较明显。 Objective To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of remifentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil combined with propofol given by target-controlled infusion (TCI) for artificial abortion. Methods Three hundred and ninety ASA Ⅰ patients aged 18-40 yr undergoing artificial abortion were randomly divided into 3 groups: group Ⅰ received a single bolus of fentanyl 1μg/kg (F, n = 134) ; group Ⅱ received remifentanil given by TCI (target plasma concentration CT = 4 ng/ml) (R, n = 120) and group Ⅲ received a single bolus of sufentanil 0.1 μg/kg (S, n = 136). All patients in the 3 groups were anesthetized with TCI of propofol (CT = 4 μg/ml ). The onset time (from start of TCI of propofol to loss of eye-lash reflex), the recovery time (from the end of operation to eye-opening on verbal command), orientation time (from eye-opening on verbal command to correctly telling one's birthday), body movement during operation, respiratory depression score (1 = normal respiratory rate, 2 = RR 8-12 bpm, 3 = RR 〈 8 bpm), HR, MAP, SpO2 during operation, side-effects after operation and the total amount of propofol used were recorded and compared among the 3 groups. Results There was no significant difference in onset time and orientation time among the 3 groups. The recovery time was significantly longer in group R than in group F and S (P 〈 0.01). The total amount of propofol was smaller and the incidence of body movement during operation and postoperative nausea and vomiting and somnolence were significantly lower in group R than in group F and S (P 〈 0.01, 0.05). Respiratory depression was severer in group R than in group F and S ( P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion The analgesic effect of propofol by TCI plus remifentanil via TCI is best with less sideeffect among the 3 groups but more attention should be paid to respiratory depression in group R.
出处 《中华麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第3期221-224,共4页 Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
关键词 哌啶类 舒芬太尼 芬太尼 二异丙酚 药物释放系统 流产 人工 Peperidines Sufentanil Fentanyl Propofol Drug delivery system Abortion, induced
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Smith I, Thwaites AJ. Target-controlled propofol vs. sevoflurane: a double-blind, randomised comparison in day-case anaesthesia. Anaesthesia, 1999,54:745-752.
  • 2Burns R, McCrae AF, Tiplady B. A comparison of target-controlled therapy with patient-controlled administration of propofol combined with midazolam for sedation during dental surgery. Anaesthesia, 2003, 58: 170-176.
  • 3刘秀芬,曲元,吴新民.瑞芬太尼效应室靶控输注在人工流产手术中的应用[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2005,11(2):81-84. 被引量:28
  • 4金毅,徐建国,林宁,杨建军.芬太尼与异丙酚联合用于人工流产术的麻醉[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2001,21(11):700-701. 被引量:212
  • 5王若松.靶控输注静脉麻醉[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2001,21(10):587-590. 被引量:71
  • 6吴新民.静脉麻醉的一些进展[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2001,21(10):586-587. 被引量:39
  • 7Peacock JE, Philip BK. Ambulatory anesthesia experience with remifentanil. Anesth Analg, 1999, 89 ( 4Suppl ) : S22-S27.
  • 8Sear JW. Recent advances and developments in the clinical use of i.v. opioids during the perioperative period. Br J Anaesth, 1998,81: 38-50.
  • 9Finco G, Polati E, Rigo V,et al. New opioids in 1-day surgery. Ambul Surg, 1997, 4: 125-129.
  • 10Bouillon T, Bruhn J, Radu-Radulescu L, et al. Non-steady state analysis of the pharmacokinetic interaction between propofol and remifentanil. Anesthesiology , 2002,97 : 1350-1362.

二级参考文献10

共引文献326

同被引文献89

引证文献23

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部