我国双务合同中标的物风险负担

Risk burden of the object in double business contract in China

在我国民商法域内,标的物本身的损毁、灭失风险分担日渐凸现。客观地说,《民法通则》和《合同法》就此问题虽有立法,但已有的立法例在司法实践的适用中暴露出一些弊端。这弊端抑制我国内部、和国际民商贸易交往。如何克服这些缺失,在概括了解外国发达国家的先进理念和立法后,呼吁我国正在进行酝酿的《民法典》能够有所作为,并且提出在《民法典》颁布前的可行性良性操作建议。同时呼吁重视标的物以外的标的和其他原因而引起的损毁、灭失风险分担。

In China＇s civil law jurisdiction, the risk-sharing of the damage or loss of the object itself is emerging gradually. Objectively speaking, despite the legislation of the ＂General Principles of Civil Law＂ and ＂Contract Law＂ on this issue, the existing legislation revealed some shortcomings in the application of judicial practice. These shortcomings restrain our internal and international trade in civil and commercial exchanges. How to overcome these shortcomings？ After the general understanding of advanced concepts and legislation of foreign developed countries, we called the ongoing brewing ＂Civil Code＂ will be able to get things done and made the feasible and good operating suggestion before the promulgation of the ＂Civil Code＂. We also called attention to the risk-sharing of the damage or loss of the object caused by other objects and other reasons.