期刊文献+

认知风格对大学生不确定条件下判断和决策的影响 被引量:8

The Effects of Cognitive Style on College Students' Judgement and Decision-Making under Uncertain Situations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过3个实验,研究了认知风格对大学生不确定条件下判断和决策的影响。结果表明:(1)认知风格影响大学生在不确定条件下的判断和决策,表现在概率推理中,场依存型比场独立型更容易受“代表性启发”影响。在赌徒推理中,场独立型更少受“赌徒谬误”影响。在风险决策中,场独立型倾向选择受益大、风险也大的决策,场依存型倾向选择稳妥、风险较小的决策。(2)大学生在概率推理、赌徒推理和风险决策时存在显著的性别差异。(3)概率知识学习有助于克服“代表性启发”,但对“赌徒谬误”影响不大。 We investigated the effects of cognitive style on college students' judgement and decision-making through four experiments. The results show : ( 1 ) Cognitive style affects students' judgement and decisionmaking in four aspects. In probabilistic reasoning, field-dependent students are more influenced by stereotype characteristics than those who are filed-independent. In gambler reasoning, field-independent students are less influenced by gambler's fallacy. In risk decisions, field-independent students tend to choose the more risky, more profitable decisions while the field-dependent students tend 'to have the safer and less risky choices; (2) Male and female students demonstrate differences in probabilistic reasoning, gambler reasoning and risk decisions; (3) Probability knowledge is useful in overcoming stereotype characteristics,yet it is of little help in avoiding gambler's fallacy.
作者 王惠萍
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2006年第4期340-346,共7页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
关键词 大学生 认知风格 判断和决策 college students, cognitive style, judgement and decision-making
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1王甦.认知心理学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2004(11).113,171.
  • 2刘力,张峥,熊德华,张圣平.行为金融学与心理学[J].心理科学进展,2003,11(3):249-255. 被引量:28
  • 3Heath C,Tversky A.Preference and belief:ambiguity and competence in choice allder uncertainty.Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,1991,4:5~28.
  • 4Josephs R,Larrick R P,Steele C M,Nisbert R E.Protecting the selffrom the negative consequence of risky decisions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1996,62:26~37.
  • 5Ritov I.Probability of regret:anticipation of uncertainty resolution in Choice.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1996,66:228~236.
  • 6Holton B,Pyszczynski T.Biased information search in the interpersonal domain.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology Bulletin,1989,15:42~51.
  • 7H.A.witkin:Role of the field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles in acdemic evolution:a longitudinal study.Journal of Educational Psychology,1977,(69):3,197~211.
  • 8林崇德.学习与发.北京:北京师范大学出版社,2000.468
  • 9张春兴.现代心理.上海:上海人民出版社,1998.331
  • 10侯公林,章自量,吴晓山,沈浪泳.场独立性一依存性认知方式性别差异的实验研究[J].心理科学,1997,20(4):367-368. 被引量:25

二级参考文献23

  • 1Heath C, Tversky A. Preference and Belief: Ambiguity and Competence in Choice under Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1991, 4:5-28.
  • 2Fox C, Tversky A. Ambiguity Aversion and Comparative Ignorance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, 110:585-603.
  • 3Josephs R, Larrick RP, Steele C M, Nisbett R E. Protecting the self from the negative consequences of risky decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 62:26-37.
  • 4Ritov I. Probability of regret: Anticipation of uncertainty resolution in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996, 66:228-236.
  • 5Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, 1979, 47:263-291.
  • 6Brad B, Odean T. Online Investors: Do the Slow Die First? Review of Financial Studies, 2002, 15:455-488.
  • 7Nicholas B, Huang M, Santos T. Prospect Theory and Assets Price. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001,116:1-53.
  • 8Kahneman D, Tversky A. Judgment Under Uneertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 1974, 185: 1124-1131.
  • 9Rabin M. Inference by Believers in the Law of Small Numbers. Quaxtefly journal of Economics, 2002,117:775-816.
  • 10Kahneman D, Tversky A On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review 1973, 80:237-251.

共引文献56

同被引文献95

引证文献8

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部