期刊文献+

中国农村反贫困政策的反思——从社会救助向社会保护转变 被引量:237

Reflection on China's Rural Anti-poverty Policies:Transition from Social Assistance to Social Protection
原文传递
导出
摘要 在中国反贫困战略取得举世瞩目成绩的时候,农村剩余贫困人口的特征凸显了开发式扶贫政策的局限:它对于地域和贫困人口劳动能力的依赖使得其对于剩余贫困人口的政策边际效益几乎等于零,因此重构农村反贫困政策势在必行。在对发达国家新的社会政策,亦即积极的社会政策的理论基础——人力资本理论、生命周期理论与社会风险管理理论进行评述的基础上,作者利用2004年农村住户问卷调查数据分析了中国农村贫困人口的特征和致贫因素,并对社会救助政策的效果进行了评估,认为中国农村反贫困政策要从社会救助转向社会保护。为此提出了“四驾马车”的反贫困政策框架,即由普遍性的医疗保障制度、普惠型社会福利、选择性社会救助以及新型开发式扶贫政策组成的“四驾马车”来共同发挥作用。 While China's anti-poverty strategy has witnessed remarkable achievements,the existence of a poverty-stricken surplus rural population highlights the limitations of development-oriented policies of poverty alleviation.The fact that they depend on the regions and on the working capacity of the poor means that the marginal utility of policies for the surplus poor is close to zero.This means that we need to restructure rural anti-poverty policies.This paper is based on a discussion of the theoretical basis of new social policies in the developed countries,i.e.active policies-human capital theory,life cycle theory,and social risk management theory.The authors utilize data from a 2004 survey of rural households to analyze the characteristics of the rural poor and the reasons they fall into poverty and evaluate the effects of the social assistance policy.They argue that China's rural anti-poverty policies should make the transition from social assistance to social protection.To this end,they put forward a “four-horse team” of measures functioning together as an anti-poverty policy framework:a universal health guarantee system,a universally accessible system of social welfare,selective social assistance and a new model of development-oriented poverty alleviation.
出处 《中国社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第3期40-53,共14页 Social Sciences in China
基金 亚洲开发银行的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1国家统计局.《2005年中国农村贫困监测报告》.
  • 2张秀兰,徐月宾,方黎明.《中国农村减贫政策的反思和建议》,樊纲、王小鲁主编.《收入分配与公共政策》,上海远东出版社,2005年,第235—252页.
  • 3J. Midgley, Growth, Redistribution and Welfare: Toward Social Investment, Social Service Review, vol. 73, no. 1 (March 1999), pp. 3--21.
  • 4A. Giddens, The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998.
  • 5P. Taylor-Gooby, Social Welfare and Social Investment: Innovations in the Welfare State, Paper presented at the International Summer Symposium and Lectures on Social Policy, August 24^th--27^th, 2006, Beijing Normal University.
  • 6A. B. Garcia and J. V. Gruat,Social Protection: A Life Cycle Continuum Investment for Social Justice , Poverty Reduction and Development. Geneva: Social Protection Sector, ILO, 2003.
  • 7C. de Neubourg, J. Castonguay and K. Roelen, Social Safety Nets and Targeted Social Assistance: Lessons from the European Experience. http- //www1. worldbank. org/sp/safetynets/Training_ Events/OECD_3-05/EU_Briefing_ Book. pdf.
  • 8Expanding Opportunities : How Active Social Policy Can Benefit Us All. Paris: OECD, 2005.
  • 9M. d' Ercole and A. Salvini, Towards Sustainable Development: The Role of Social Protection. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper, no. 12, Paris: OECD, 2003.
  • 10World Bank, Social Protection Sector Strategy from Safety Net to Springboard, Washington, D. C.:World Bank, 2001.

同被引文献3029

引证文献237

二级引证文献3312

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部