摘要
In Chinese academic circles, the realistic character of Marxist philosophy has been generally acknowledged and consistently stressed. Indeed, Marxism as a modern philosophy, like other branches of modern philosophy, has done away with traditional Western ＂metaphysics,＂ and dispensed with the systematic structure of axiomatic deduction, shifting from ＂the priority of theory＂ to ＂the priority of practice＂; furthermore, it attaches special importance to the transformation of the existing world through practice, emancipating people in the perceptual world. In China, Marxist philosophy is more concerned with and involved in practical realities than any other philosophy, which, in turn, pushes forward the development of Marxist philosophy in the East. However, every coin has two sides. When we value the practical nature of Marxist philosophy and overlook its transcendence, hoping to reap instant results, we either fall speechless or come up with vague or dogmatic comments when faced with radical changes in social life. Besides social factors, I believe that this situation is closely related to our misunderstanding of the practical realism of Marxist philosophy. In fact, for Marxist philosophy, there is always an ultimate concern that transcends realities within its concern for realities; the aim of realizing the meaning of life is embodied in its proposals for changing the world, and it contains ontology as well as methodology. Marxist studies in China must be orientated towards the world, but they must also take into account Chinese social conditions and realities; it is right to pay attention to changes in contemporary Western philosophy, but it is not advisable to indiscriminately copy Western post-modern intellectual trends and dissolve all other philosophies about the nature of things. We are now going to discuss the relationship between actuality and transcendence in Marxist philosophy and other related topics.
多年来,中国的马克思主义哲学研究在取得较大成绩的同时,由于存在着一种重视马克思哲学的"现实性"而轻视"超越性"的思想倾向和研究要求,也产生了一定的表浅化问题。文章在指出并分析了马克思主义哲学研究中存在的五个问题或不足之后,对于马克思哲学的存在论和方法论的含义及其统一,从人的存在的历史性的角度做出了诠释,突出地强调了无论对于我们的理论研究还是现实实践而言,都应确立一种富有张力的思想和一种长远的眼光。
