期刊文献+

仁爱与关怀——儒家的仁爱教育思想与诺丁斯的关怀教育思想之比较 被引量:7

Jen-Love and Caring——The Comparison between Confucian Jen-Love Education and Noddings'Caring Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 儒家的仁爱教育和诺丁斯的关怀教育在精神实质和教育理念上有很多相通之处,如都把情感作为道德的基础,重视情感教育;均视家庭教育为教育的起点。但两者也存在很多不同之处,如仁爱作为个体美德与关怀作为关系美德之不同;重责任教育与重权利教育之不同;培养男性为主的君子与培养两性平等的关怀者之不同。仁爱教育与关怀教育之比较,不仅有利于解释仁爱教育的现代化内涵,而且也能充实关怀教育思想。 There are many resemblances in spiritual essence and ideal of education between Jen-Love Education and Caring Education. Both of them are based on human relatedness being and emphasize constructing good teacher-student relation; both stress the importance of emotion in the moral education; both start with family education. However, many difference such as individual virtue and relational virtue, stressing duty education and power education, cultivating different aims of male junzi and dual-gender carer. By comparison, not only can we understand the value of Jen-Love education better in our time, but the theory of caring education can be enriched and strengthened.
作者 苏静
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第4期29-33,共5页 International and Comparative Education
关键词 仁爱 关怀 仁爱教育 关怀教育 Jen-Love, caring Jen-Love education caring education
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Noddings. N.Caring:A Femine Approach to Ethics & Moral Education.California: University of California Press. 1984, pp.23-24, p.80.
  • 2方志华.关怀伦理学之理论发展与教育实践[M].台湾:台湾师范大学出版社,1990.336,337.
  • 3内尔·诺丁斯.学会关心-教育的另一种模式[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2003.30-31、31、5.
  • 4侯晶晶.南京师范大学博士论文[D].2004.117.
  • 5陈荣捷.儒家仁概念的演化.东西方哲学,1955,(4):314-314.

共引文献40

同被引文献73

引证文献7

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部