摘要
目的:调查我国心内科医生对急性ST段抬高心肌梗死(STEMI)临床指南的了解与使用情况,为促进指南执行提出具体建议。方法:采用不记名问卷形式,对我国部分省市310名心内科医生进行调查。结果:绝大多数被访者认为,需要临床指南(99.0%)及中国临床指南(94.5%),参考美国心脏病学会2004年临床指南的人数最多,占58.5%,对其知晓和认可情况在三级甲等医院和其他医院间差异无显著性,14.0%主要参考中国现有指南。知识得分及格率三甲医院为75.0%,其他医院64.4%,其差异与医生的学历有关(β=0.127,s=0.036,sβ=0.201,P=0.001)。被访医生主要(52.4%)使用大开本印刷版形式的临床指南,常用数据库为美国心脏病学会/美国心脏病协会(ACC/AHA)指南库(34.2%)和MEDLINE(32.6%),96.7%希望建立中国指南数据库以便获取指南信息。阻碍指南执行的因素集中于“患者依从性差”(51.8%)、“医生对指南内容不清楚”(49.2%)以及“费用因素”(47.9%),“加强医生教育”(82.1%)、“精简指南使其建议突出”(69.7%)和“加强患者教育”(53.1%)可能有助于促进临床指南的进一步执行。结论:应积极更新中国心肌梗死临床指南,建立中国指南数据库,加强医生与患者教育,促进指南执行。
Objective:To investigate the knowledge and attitudes towards ST-elevation myocardial infarction guidelines among Chinese cardiologists and give some recommendations for dissemination and implement of clinical guidelines. Method: An anonymous questionnaire was administered to 310 cardiologists from 15 provinces in China. Result:Almost all of the interviewees (99.0%) stated that clinical guidelines were needed either to a major or moderate extent, and 94.5% believed they needed native guidelines. However, only 14.0% claimed implementing current Chinese myocardial infarction guideline. Most cardiologists (58.5%) selected the guideline developed by American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association in 2004 to helop making clinical decisions. There is no statistically significant difference of the awareness and acceptance between hospitals of grade A class Ⅲ and others. The pass rate of the examination is 75.0% and 64.4% in hospitals of grade A class Ⅲ and others respectively,the doctors' degree should account for the difference ( β = 0.127, s = 0.036, sβ = 0.201, P - 0.001 ). When using a guideline,a majority (52.4%) selected the book edition as the fagvorite form. And 96.7% believed they need a Chinese guideline databhase to achieve more guideline information. Key barriers to greater implementation of guidelines were seen as patient compliance (51.8%),lack of guideline knowledge among doctors (49.2%), and prescription costs (47.9). Suggestions for ways to improve implementation centered on more education for doctors (82.1% ), simplifying the guidelines (69.7 % ), and more education for patients (53.1% ). Conclusion: Chinese cardiologists need updated native clinical guidelines of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, as well as a Chinese guideline database. It is suggested that training for the implementation of the guidelines be strengtaened, both for doctors and patients.
出处
《心肺血管病杂志》
CAS
2007年第2期96-99,共4页
Journal of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases
关键词
心肌梗死
临床指南
心内科医生
临床调查
Myocardial infarction
Clinical guidelines
Cardiologists
Clinical survey