期刊文献+

内皮祖细胞和单个核细胞移植对糖尿病大鼠血管病变疗效的比较 被引量:4

Comparison of transplantation of endothelial progenitor cells and mononuclear cells on the treatment of ischemic disorder in the hind limb of diabetic rats
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较内皮祖细胞(EPC)和单个核细胞(MNC)移植改善糖尿病大鼠后肢血管病变的疗效。方法将大鼠EPC和外周血MNC标记后分别植入糖尿病大鼠缺血后肢。对照组仅植入PBS溶液。ELISA法检测VEGF的含量,免疫组化法计数毛细血管数目。结果EPC和MNC均能在缺血后肢分化为毛细血管。移植后EPC组和MNC组大鼠缺血肢体局部VEGF含量高于对照组,毛细血管数目也高于对照组。但EPC组和MNC组VEGF含量和毛细血管数目无明显差异。结论移植EPC及含有相当数量EPC的MNC对糖尿病大鼠后肢血管病变的改善作用相似。EPC可能在外周血单个核细胞移植中发挥主要作用。 Objective To compare the effects of transplantations of endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) and rnononuclear cells (MNC) on improving the ischernic disorder of hind limbs in diabetic rats. Methods The in vitro cultured EPC were transplanted into the ischernic area of 10 diabetic rats in EPC group. 10 diabetic rats in MNC group accepted peripheral MNC transplantation. 8 rats in control group were transplanted with PBS. ELISA method was used to detect the concentration of VEGF in the ischernic area. The numbers of capillary were counted through irnrnunohistochernistry staining. Results EPC and peripheral MNC were able to differentiate into capillaries in the ischernic area. The concentrations of VEGF and the numbers of capillary were higher in both EPC group and MNC group than in control group, with no significant difference between EPC group and MNC group. Conclusions The effects of allotype EPCs and MNC transplantations with equivalent number of EPCs on diabetic rats were similar. EPC may play a major role in peripheral MNC transplantation in treating ischernic disorder.
出处 《中国糖尿病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第4期243-245,共3页 Chinese Journal of Diabetes
关键词 内皮祖细胞 单个核细胞 移植 血管病变 Endothelial progenitor cell Mononuclear cell Transplantation Vascular disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Kalka C, Masuda H, Takahashi T, et al. Transplantation of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cells for therapeutic neovascularization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2000, 97: 3422-3427.
  • 2Urbich C, Dimmeler S. Endothelial progenitor cells: characterization and role in vascular biology. Circ Res, 2004, 95:343-353.
  • 3Gehling UM, Erigiin S, Sehumaeher U, et al. In vitro differentiation of endothelial eells from AC133-positive progenitor eells. Blood, 2000, 95: 3106-3112.
  • 4Mutin M, Canavy I, Blann A, et al. Direct evidence of endothelial injury in acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina by demonstration of circulating endothelial cells. Blood, 1999, 93: 2951-2958.
  • 5Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, et al. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science, 1997, 275: 964-967.
  • 6Kang HJ, Kim SC, Kim YJ, et al. Short-term phytohaemagglutinin-activated mononuclear ceils induce endothelial progenitor cells from cord blood CD34^+ cells. Br J Haematol, 2001, 113: 962-969.
  • 7Fan CL, Li Y, Gao PJ, et al. Differentiation of endothelial progenitor cells from human umbilical cord blood CD 34 + cells in vitro. Acta Pharmacol Sin, 2003, 24: 212-218.

同被引文献52

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部