1[1]FORRINGTON C P, MANNING G. Test statistics and sample size formulae for comparative binomial trials with null hypothesis of non-zero risk difference or non-unity relative risk[ J ]. Statistics in Medicine, 1990, 9 (12): 1447-1 454.
2[2]YANAGAWA T, TANGO T, HEIJIMA Y. Mantd Haenszel-Type test for testing equivalence or more than equivalence in comparative clinical trials [ J ]. Biometrics, 1994, 50(3): 859-864.
3[3]NAM J. Sample size determination in stratified trials to establish the equivalence of two treatments[J ]. Statisticsin Medicine, 1995, 14(18) :2 037-2 049.
4[4]LU Y, BEAN J A. On the sample size for one-sided e quivalence of sensitivities based upon McNemar' s test [J]. Statistics in Medicine, 1995, 14 (17): 1 831-1 839.
5[5]TANGO T. Equivalence test and confidence interval for the difference in proportions for the paired-sample design [J]. Statistics in Medicine, 1998, 17(8): 891-908.
6[6]TAMGP T. Improved confidence intervals for the differ ence between binomial proportions based on paired data [J ]. Statistics in Medicine, 1999, 18 (24): 3 511-3 513.
7[7]TANG M L, TANG N S, CHAN I S F, et al. Sample size determination for establishing equivalence/noninfe riority via ratio of two proportions in matched-pair de sign [ J ]. Biometrics, 2002, 58 (4): 957-963.
8[8]LACHENBRUCH P A, LYNCH C J. Assessing screen ing tests: extensions of McNemar' s test[J]. Statistics inMedicine, 1998, 17(19) :2 207-2 217.
