从《汉书》称《诗》论定《毛诗序》基本完成于《史记》之前——兼答张启成先生的商榷

Preface of Mao's Poetry earlier than Records of Historian——A debate in reply to Mr.Zhang Qicheng's Debate

通过对《汉志》所载“《毛诗》二十九卷”和“《毛诗故训传》三十卷”的重新解读,并结合清人的意见,认为所谓“故训传”包括两方面的内容:“故训”恰恰是今所谓“毛传”的内容;而“传”恰恰是今所谓“毛序”的内容,并梳理了西汉《毛诗》的传本情况。在《史记》广泛流传之前,《毛诗序》已经存在并流传。结合经学史,论证《左传》、《古文尚书》在汉初已经成书并流传;《古文尚书》并非只有孔安国一个系统。卫宏不可能作《毛诗序》。卫宏在东汉中前期古文经学兴盛时期,对流传已久的《毛诗序》有可能做了“润益”的工作,更重要的,是他第一次将“毛诗故训传”中“传”的内容,定名为《毛诗序》。后世所谓卫宏“作《毛诗序》”的说法,盖由此而来。

Through the reinterpretations, combined with the review of scholarly researches in Qing, of 29 volumes of Mao＇s Poetry and 30 volumes of Reconstructions of Mao＇s Poetry, in the Complete History of Han , the writer claims that the Reconstructions of Mao ＇ s Poetry refers to the contents of Mao ＇ s Poetry and Preface of Mao＇s Poetry. In addition, the writer has also reviewed the versions of Mao＇s Poetry in the Western Han, and concluded that Preface of Mao＇ s Poetry is popular long before Records of Historian. Besides, according to other Confucian classics, Wei Hong may as well have done proofreading of, but not written, Mao＇ s Poetry. Moreover, he defines the biographies in the. reconstructions as Preface of Mao＇s Poetry, which later generations follow suit