期刊文献+

一个关于供应链利润分配的分析——基于模型和实验的对比 被引量:7

An Analysis on Profit Allocation of Supply Chain——Contrast Analysis between Model and Experiment
原文传递
导出
摘要 供应链的协调问题是供应链管理的一个重要方面,基于可部分退货的供应链契约,从契约模型和实验两个方面分析供应链利润的分配状况。结果表明,实验中供应链的平均利润与供应链的最大期望利润非常接近,但在这两种情形下供应链利润的分配比例差异较大。在理论模型中销售商占有供应链利润的绝大部分,而在实验中供应商占有供应链利润的绝大部分,并且销售商的订货量与批发价格之间不像通常认为的那样具有较强的负相关性,最后对产生这些差异的原因做了简单分析。 Supply chain management (SCM) is an important content of enterprise's strategic management, and the coordination of the supply chain is an important aspect of SCM. This paper studies the profit allocation problem of supply chain from two aspects of contract model and experiment. The results indicate the average profit of the supply chain is approximately equal to the optimal mean profit of the supply chain. But there is much difference in the proportion of the profit allocation between the two methods. In the theory model, the supplier gains the lion's share of the supply chain profit, while in the experiment, the situation is just reverse. And there is not an obvious correlation between the retailer's order quantity and the supplier's wholesale prices. In the end, this paper simply analyses the causes of these differences.
出处 《管理科学》 CSSCI 2007年第2期25-30,共6页 Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(70571055 70471069)
关键词 供应链 契约 利润分配 实验 supply chain contract profit allocation experiment
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1阮青松,余颖,黄向晖.关于经济人假设的实验经济学研究综述[J].学术研究,2005(4):37-40. 被引量:4
  • 2Vernon L Smith.Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science[J].American Economic Review,1982,72 (5):923-955.
  • 3高鸿桢.实验经济学的理论与方法[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,53(1):5-14. 被引量:27
  • 4Bolton Gary E,Axel Ockenfels.ERC:A Theory of Equity,Reciprocity,and Competition[J].American Economic Review,2000,90(1):166-193.
  • 5Bolton Gary E.A Comparative Model of Bargaining:Theory and Evidence[J].American Economic Review,1991,81(5):1096-1136.
  • 6Vernon L Smith.An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior[J].Journal of Political Economy,1962,70(2):111-137.
  • 7朱庆.实验经济学述评[J].经济学家,2003(1):105-107. 被引量:5
  • 8Gérard P Cachon.Supply Chain Coordination with Contracts[R].University of Pennsylvania Working Paper,2002.
  • 9Andy A Tsay,Steven Nahmias,Narendra Agrawal.Modeling Supply Chain Contracts:A Review[C]//S Tayur,R Ganeshan,M Magazine.Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management.Kluwer Academic Publishers,1999:299-336.
  • 10杨德礼,郭琼,何勇,徐经意.供应链契约研究进展[J].管理学报,2006,3(1):117-125. 被引量:115

二级参考文献192

共引文献265

同被引文献94

引证文献7

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部