期刊文献+

域名法律问题研究 被引量:1

The Research on the Legal Qstion of Domain Name
下载PDF
导出
摘要 域名是一种用于互联网上识别和定位计算机的地址系统。域名应归入到知识产权的范畴。域名注册机构一般不承担因域名争议引起的法律责任。域名与商标权和商号权之间易产生法律冲突。驰名商标的商标权可以延伸至域名权,将普通商标抢注为域名者主观上存在故意时构成侵犯商标权行为,巧合雷同、非商业性使用、域名注册在先、合理使用行为不侵犯商标权。 The domain name is one kind uses in on the Internet distinguishing and locating the computer the address system. The domain name should belong to the intellectual property rights category. Because the domain name registration organization does not undertake the domain name to dispute generally causes legal liability. Between the domain name and the trademark rights and the company power easy to have the legal conflict. The trademark rights of famous trademark may extend to the domain name power, snatches the ordinary trademark the note on subjective ex- ists for the domain name intentionally when to constitute identically infringement trademark rights behavior, the co- incidence, the non -commercial character use, the domain name registration in, the reasonable use behavior does not encroach first the trademark rights.
作者 刘丹
出处 《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》 2007年第2期40-43,共4页 Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators
关键词 网络域名 商业标识 商标权 法律冲突 the domain name commercial log trademark rights legal conflict
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献9

  • 1中国社会科学院知识产权研究中心.《中国互联网络域名争议解决办法》论证报告(简本),见http://www.cn—register.com/policy/10.htm.2005/1 1/28.
  • 2M. Halpern and A. Mehrotra, 'From International Treaties to Internet Norms: TheEvolution of International Trade mark Disputes in the Internet Age' (2000) 21 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 523, 525.
  • 3WIPO大会与保护工业产权巴黎联盟大会的《联合建议》第6条第(1)款.
  • 4WIPO administrative decisions of 19 March 2002, Case No D2001-1502, Arjen Verkaik v. Crownonlinemedia. com.
  • 5WIPO administrative panel decision of 2 January 2001, Case No. D2000-1202, Deutsche Welle v. Diamond Ware Limited.
  • 6WIPO administrative panel decision of 29 May 2002, Case No. D2002-0189, GLB Servi?os Interativos S.A.v. Ultimate Search Inc (aka Ult. Search Inc).
  • 7WIPO administrative panel decision of 18 October 2000, Case No. D2000-0993,Smart Design LLC v. Carolyn Hughes.
  • 8WIPO administrative panel decision of 20 July 200l, Case No. D2001-0537, G.A.Modefine S.A.v.A.E. Mani.
  • 9薛虹.域名抢注的法律分析[J].科技与法律,1999,0(1):11-19. 被引量:10

共引文献1

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部