期刊文献+

土圞儿属和旋花豆属(豆科)的叶表皮特征及其系统学意义(英文) 被引量:1

Systematic significance of leaf epidermal features in Apios and Cochlianthus (Leguminosae)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 应用光学显微镜和扫描电子显微镜观察了豆科Leguminosae土圞儿属Apios和旋花豆属Cochlianthus植物的叶表皮特征。在光学显微镜下,大多数种类的叶表皮细胞形状(表面观)为不规则型,垂周壁式样为浅波状或波状,只有一个种——Apios gracillima Dunn叶表皮细胞为多边形,垂周壁式样为较平直。在扫描电子显微镜下,多数种类的叶片蜡质纹饰通常为片状或颗粒状,一些种叶表皮未见蜡质纹饰;气孔器外拱盖内缘通常为浅波状或近平滑。在这两个属内,上述叶表皮特征在物种内较稳定,因此对于解决属内种间和属间关系有一定的系统学意义。本研究得出以下结论:(1)A.gracillima叶的上表皮细胞为多边形,垂周壁平直或弧形,A.delavayi Franch.叶的上表皮细胞为不规则形,垂周壁波状,二者存在明显差异,因此A.gracillima应处理为一独立的种,而不是A.delavayi下的一个变种;(2)A.priceana B.L.Rob.在叶表皮细胞形状、垂周壁式样、气孔器类型和蜡质纹饰形态等方面与土圞儿属中其他种不存在显著区别,因此土圞儿属内两个亚属的划分是不合理的;(3)土圞儿属多为5或7小叶,无毛或近无毛,叶表皮细胞垂周壁波状或近平直,而旋花豆属3小叶,密被柔毛,叶表皮细胞垂周壁浅波状,本文支持它们为两个独立的属的分类处理。 Nineteen leaf epidermis samples representing six species in Apios and two in Cochlianthus were examined for the first time using both light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Leaf epidermal characters of these two closely related genera, such as shape of cells, pattern of anticlinal walls, cuticular membrane and wax ornamentation, are usually stable within species and thus of great significance in understanding the relationships between and within genera. The results indicate that (1) A. gracillima Dunn should be recognized as a distinct species, not a variety of Apios delavayi Franch., (2) the division of Apios into two subgenera is unreasonable, and (3) Apios and Cochlianthus are retained as two distinct genera.
出处 《植物分类学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第3期274-284,共11页 Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica
基金 Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China,Grant Nos.30570117 & 30270105 the Set-up Fund from the Chinese Academy of Sciences to the Excellent Post-doctor.
关键词 豆科 土圞儿属 旋花豆属 叶表皮 系统学意义 Leguminosae, Apios, Cochlianthus, leaf epidermis, systematics.
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Atchison E.1949.Studies in the Leguminosae.IV.Chromosome numbers and geographical relationships of miscellaneous Leguminosae.Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 65:118-122.
  • 2Blackmon W J.1986.Locating and growing groundnut.Apios Tribune 1:5-7.
  • 3Bruneau A,Anderson G J.1988.Reproductive biology of diploid and triploid Apios americana (Leguminosae).American Journal of Botany 75:1876-1883.
  • 4Bruneau A,Anderson G J.1994.To bee or not to bee?:The pollination biology of Apios americana (Leguminosae).Plant Systematics and Evolution 192:147-149.
  • 5Bruneau A,Doyle J J,Doyle J L.1994.Playlogenetic relationships in Phaseoleae:evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction site characters.In:Crisp M,Doyle J J eds.Advances in Legume Systematics 7:Phylogeny.London:Royal Botanic Gardens,Kew.309-330.
  • 6De Candolle A P.1825.Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis.Paris:Sumptibus Sociorum Treuttel et Wurtz.2:390.
  • 7Dilcher D L.1974.Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains.The Botanical Review 40:1-157.
  • 8Duke J A.1984.Properties of the groundnut.In:Hemenway D ed.The International Permaculture Species Yearbook.Orange,MA:Yankee Permaculture.27-29.
  • 9Haskin L L.1929."Nunas" and "noonas":Indians love their roots and palefaces their flowers.Nature Magazine 14:119.
  • 10Hutchinson J.1964.The Genera of Flowering Plants(Angiospermae).Oxford,England:Oxford University Press.

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部