期刊文献+

《文心雕龙》与《文选》的选赋情况比较

Comparison of fu Selection Between The Literary Mind And the Carving of The Dragon and Anthology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《文心雕龙》与《文选》在汉大赋的选择上体现出了高度的一致性,在“情”赋的选择上也显现了文学观念的共同性。二者取材的差异主要体现在有关“哀伤”一类的赋及有关“志”类的赋。总的说来,刘勰选取的抒情性作品在数量上远远少于萧统,在质(情感取向)上也迥然有异。在文学的边界有些模糊的今天,更多包容地看待他们彼此的差异也许会有益于我们对文学的思考与定位。 The Literary Mind And the Carving of The Dragon and Athology manifest their striking uniformity in the selection offu poetic prose of the Hart Dynasty, and they also show their commonality of literary conceptions in selecting "love" fu. The difference in material-drawing between the two appears in the kind offu concerning "grief" and that concerning "ambition". On the whole, the lyric works Liu Xie first selected is far fewer than that selected by Xiao Tong, moreover, there exists entire difference in essence( emotional orientation). Nowadays when the boundary of literature is vague to some degree, it will likely be helpful to our literary deliberation and location to look upon their difference tolerantly.
作者 岳进
出处 《江汉大学学报(人文科学版)》 2007年第3期74-78,共5页 Journal of Wuhan Institute of Education
关键词 刘勰 萧统 哀伤 fu(poetic prose) Liu Xie Xiao Tong grief ambition
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1范文澜.文心雕龙注[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1978..
  • 2曹道衡.《文选》对魏晋以来文学传统的继承和发展[J].文学遗产,2000(1):48-58. 被引量:17
  • 3[4]郁沅,张明高.魏晋南北朝文论选[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1999.
  • 4[5](清)何文焕.历代诗话(上)[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
  • 5[3]周祖譔.隋唐五代文论选[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1990.
  • 6[7](清)严可均.全晋文[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
  • 7[3]据杨明照《文心雕龙校注拾遗》:"味,黄注云:'一作'末'.'封禅篇云'风末力寡',与此意同."上海古籍出版社,1982年版,第250页.

共引文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部