期刊文献+

林纾与桐城派 被引量:5

Ling Shu and the Tongcheng School
下载PDF
导出
摘要 林纾与桐城派交往很多。民初特别是五四时期,桐城古文每遭异议,林纾极力为之辩护,但他并不完全赞成桐城派这一说法。桐城派主要是一个古文理论批评流派,林纾不完全赞成桐城派这一说法与此有关。方苞的义法说及其批评实践最能代表桐城派的理论批评成就。林纾接受了桐城派的众多说法,特别是将其义法说贯彻到具体的批评实践中,并有新的发展,甚至认为外国小说中也有义法。林纾的文学理论批评是对桐城派的重要贡献。 Ling Shu kept close contact with the Tongcheng School. In the beginning of the 20th century, the Tongcheng School was reproached frequently, while Ling Shu spoke in defence of it to the most. But, Ling Shu did not completely approve of the terms of the Tongcheng School. Ling Shu regarded that the Tongcheng School was a school of literature criticism, not a school of literature. Fang Bao's thorey of Yi Fa and his relevant practice of literature criticism represented the basic thought of the Tongcheng School. Ling Shu accepted the thought of Tongcheng School and put Fang's theory of Yi Fa into the literature criticism practice especially, and developed the theory. Ling Shu made a great comtribution to the Tongcheng School, and was an important member of the Tongcheng School.
作者 王济民
出处 《华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第3期105-110,共6页 Journal of Central China Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences
关键词 林纾 桐城派 义法 Ling Shu the Tongcheng School, Yi Fa
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1钱基博.现代中国文学史[M].上海:世界书局,1935.
  • 2林纾.畏庐续集[M].上海:商务印书馆,1927.
  • 3郭立志.桐城吴先生年谱:卷四[M].铅印本,1944:37.
  • 4吴闿生.桐城吴先生尺牍:四[M].1903(光绪二十九年),吴氏家刻本:41.
  • 5吴闿生.桐城吴先生日记:卷十三[M],1928年,莲池书社刻本.
  • 6林纾.畏庐三集[M].上海:商务印书馆,1927.
  • 7王镇远,邬国平.清代文论选[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1999.
  • 8简夷之,等.中国近代文论选[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1962.
  • 9李家骥,等.林纾诗文选[M].北京:商务印书馆,1993:84-85.
  • 10林纾.春觉斋论文[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1959.82.

共引文献59

同被引文献53

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部