期刊文献+

rhG-CSF对老年急性髓性白血病化疗预后的影响 被引量:3

Effects of rhG-CSF on acute myelogenous leukemia after chemotherapy in older patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(rhG-CSF)对老年急性髓性白血病(AML)化疗后应用的疗效及时机。方法对2002年1月至2006年6月住院的62例老年急性髓性白血病患者(M3除外),以联合化疗方案诱导缓解治疗后,随机分为3组:G1组(n=20)、G2组(n=18)及非G组(n=24)。G1、G2组接受rhG-CSF治疗,剂量300μg/d,皮下注射:G1组在完成诱导缓解化疗24 h后即开始,G2组在完成诱导缓解化疗后中性粒细胞计数(ANC)<0.5×109/L时开始,2组均在ANC升高至1.5×109/L时停用;非G组不应用rhG-CSF。结果3组临床缓解情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。G1组及G2组粒细胞减少、发生感染的持续时间明显短于非G组(P<0.01)。G1组感染发生率低,与非G组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);G2组感染发生率与非G组、G1组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论预防性应用rhG-CSF对于预防、治疗老年AML患者化疗后伴感染、发热是有益的,且早期应用能进一步降低化疗后感染的发生。 Objective To observe the curative effects of recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (rhGCSF) on the aged patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) after the chemotherapy. Methocis 62 patients with AML (except M3), from January 2002 to June 2006, were treated with the joint chemotherapy to induce remission, then were randomly divided into three groups: G1, G2 and Non-G group. Patients in G1 and G2 group were injected with 300μg rhG-CSF a day, injection starting from 24 hours after the chemotherapy for G1 group and from the point of ANC〉0.5×10^9/L for G2 group, and finishing at the point of ANC 〉 1.5 × 10^9/L for both groups. No rhG-CSF was used in Non-G group, glesufts The periods of granulocyte reduction and infection in GI and G2 group were significantly shorter than those in Non-G group ( P 〈 0.05). The infection incidence in G1 was lower than that of Non-G group (P〈 0.05). There was no difference of infection incidence between G1 and G2 group, and between G2 and Non-G group ( P 〉 0.05 ). Concfusion The preventive application of rhG-CSF on the patients with AML leukemia might help to prevent and treat infection and fever after chemotherapy.
出处 《广东医学院学报》 2007年第2期145-147,共3页 Journal of Guangdong Medical College
关键词 重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子 白血病 急性 化疗 recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor leukemia chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献23

  • 1朱兴彦.粒细胞集落刺激因子在血液科的应用——访上海第二医科大学附属瑞金医院血液科主任沈志祥教授[J].中华医学信息导报,2002,17(20):6-6. 被引量:1
  • 2石远凯,周际昌,冯奉仪,曾万勇,李青,何小慧,张弘刚,张湘茹,周立强.基因重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子对肿瘤化疗所致白细胞减少的临床疗效观察[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1994,16(3):207-210. 被引量:35
  • 3熊梅,常瑛.粒细胞集落刺激因子在治疗成人急性髓系白血病中的应用[J].中华血液学杂志,1997,18(6):315-315. 被引量:10
  • 4[1]Bolanos-Meade J, Karp JE, Guo C, et al. Timed sequential therapy of acute myelogenous leukemia in adults: a phase Ⅱ study of retinoids in combination with the sequential administration of cytosine arabinoside,idarubicinandetoposide. Leuk Res, 2003, 27(4):313 ~ 321.
  • 5[2]Robak T. Purine nucleoside analogues in the treatment of myleoid leukemias. Leuk Lymphoma, 2003, 44(3):391~409.
  • 6[3]Marcucci G, Byrd JC, Dai G, et al. Phase 1 and pharmacodynamic studies of G3139, a Bcl-2 antisense oligonucleotide, in combination with chemotherapyin refractory or relapsed acute leukemia. Blood, 2003, 101 (2):425 ~32.
  • 7[4]Pastore D, Specchia G, Carlaccio P, et al. FLAG-IDA in the treatment of refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia:single-center experience. Ann Hematol, 2003, 82(4):231~235.
  • 8[5]Anderson JE, Kopecky KJ, Willman CL, et al. Outcome after induction chemotherapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia is not improved with mitoxantrone and etoposide compared to cytarabine and daunorubicin:a Southwest Oncology Group study. Blood, 2002, 100(12):3869 ~ 3876.
  • 9[6]Tavernier E, Le QH, Elhamri M, et al. Salvage therapy in refractory acute myeloid leukemia: prediction of outcomebasedonanalysis of prognostic factors. Leuk Res, 2003, 27(3):205~214.
  • 10Aher D, Green M, Bishop J, et al. Randomized,placebo- controlled trial of Filgrastim (r - metHuG - CSF) in patients with febrile neutropenia(FN) following chemotherapy, abstracted[ J]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1993,12:434. :,".

共引文献13

同被引文献22

  • 1周易冬,孙强,黄汉源,茅枫,关竞红.剂量密度化疗在乳腺癌术后辅助化疗中的应用[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2007,29(4):316-318. 被引量:11
  • 2Miller LL.Ozer H. American society of clinical oncology recommendations for the use of bematopoietic colony stimulating factors: evidence based, clinical practice guidelines[J]. J Clinical Oncology, 1994,12:2471- 2508.
  • 3Ohno R, Naoe T,Kanamaru A, et al. A double-blind controlled study of granulocyte colony-stimulaling factor started two days before induction chemotherapy in refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Kohseisho leukemia study group [J]. blood, 1994, 83 (8) : 2086-2092.
  • 4Takeshita A,Ohno R, Hirashima K,et al. A randomized double blind controlled study of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with neutropenia induced by consolidation chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia. (rG. CSF clinical study group)[J].The Japanese Journal of Clinical Hematology, 1995.36(6) :606-614.
  • 5Nakajima H, Ikeda Y, Hirashima K,et al. A randomized controlled study of rG. CSF in patients with neutropenia after induction therapy for acute myelogenous leukemia. (rG. CSF Clinical Study Group) [J].The Japanese journal of clinical hematology, 1995,36(6) : 597-605.
  • 6Dombret H,Chastang C, Fenaux P,et al. A controlled study of recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor in elderly patients after treatment for acute myelogenous leukemia. AML Cooperative Study Group[J]. The New England journal of medicine, 1995,332(25) : 1678-1683.
  • 7Hell G, Hoelzer D, Sanz MA, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of filgrastim in remission induction and consolidation therapy for adults with de novo acute myeloid leukemia. The International Acute Myeloid Leukemia Study Group[J ]. Blood, 1997,90(12) : 4710-4718.
  • 8Godwin JE, Kopeeky KJ, Head DR,et al. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of granulocyte colony stimulating factor in elderly patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest oncology group study (9031) [J]. Blood,1998.91(10) :3607-3615.
  • 9I.owenberg B. Effect of priming with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on the outcome of chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia[J].The New England journal of medicine, 2003,349 (8):743-752.
  • 10Milligan DW,Wheadey K,Littlewood T.et al. Fludarabine and cytosine are less effective than standard ADE chemotherapy in high risk acute myeloid leukemia, and addition of G-CSF and ATRA are not beneficial: resuhs of the MRC AML-HR randomized trial [J]. Blood, 2006,1117 ( 12 ):4614-4622.

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部