期刊文献+

“滋味说”与“趣味批判”:以味论艺的中西比较 被引量:3

The Artistic Taste Idea and the Artistic Taste Critique: A Comparison of the Chinese Literary Critique and the Western Literary Critique from the Artistic Taste Approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国先秦、西方古希腊时期都已开始在比喻的意义上用味来阐释艺术现象。齐梁之际的钟嵘秉承一以贯之的以味喻艺的传统,提出“滋味说”,将味纳入美学领域;西方则在16世纪开始广泛讨论趣味,经由“古今之争”的推动,将趣味作为艺术学科的基础概念,才使趣味进入美学。中国美学直接将味引入审美领域,而西方则在剔除趣味感性意义的基础上使用它;“滋味说”是中国古典美学理论新的生发与丰富,“趣味批判”一方面为美学学科的确立奠定了基础,另一方面因与启蒙思潮相联系而具备着更为广阔的社会意义。 Before Qin Dynasty and in ancient Greece, taste had already been used as a kind of metaphor to discuss art. Between Qi and Liang Dynasty, Zhongrong bring out "Theory of Taste" on the base of metaphorical using of taste. Then taste became a important term in Chinese asthetics. On the contrast, it was 1400 years later, that is to say in 16th century that taste was paid much attention to. And through "Debate between Ancientness and Modernness", taste was used as the core term of art in western asthetics. In Chinese taste was directly brought into asthetics. In the west it was eliminated its perceptual sense before which was brought into asthetics. In Chinese, "Theory of Taste" enriched theory of asthetics. In western, "Critique of Taste" es- tablished the science of asthetics and possessed wide sense for its relation to The Enlightenment.
作者 田春
出处 《湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 北大核心 2007年第3期65-68,共4页 Journal of Hubei University(Philosophy and Social Science)
关键词 滋味 趣味批判 言不尽意 taste critique of taste whose words can't express all his intention
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1笠原仲二.“美”字在《说文》中的本义和审美意识的起源[M]//美学译文:3.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1984.
  • 2陈寅恪.胨寅恪史学论文集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1992.
  • 3克罗齐.作为表现的科学和一般语言学的美学的历史[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1984.153-154.
  • 4文杜里.西方艺术批评史[M].迟轲,译.海口:海南人民出版社,1983.
  • 5韦勒克.近代文学批评史:第一卷[M].杨岂深,杨自伍,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1987.
  • 6康德.判断力批判[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996.
  • 7穆拉托里.论意大利诗的完美化[M]//西方美学家论美和美感.北京:商务印书馆,1982.
  • 8考斯梅尔.味觉[M].吴琼,叶勤,张雷,译.北京:中国友谊出版公司,2001.
  • 9休谟.人性的高贵与卑劣--休谟散文集[M].杨适,译.上海:三联书店,1988.

共引文献17

同被引文献35

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部