期刊文献+

“中医生存质量自评量表”的评价 被引量:19

Assessment on the self-evaluation scale of life quality of TCM
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:构建并验证“中医生存质量自评量表”的可行性、信度、效度、反应度。方法:在整体观念指导下,体现中医临床信息和辨证的特点,基于整体症状、五脏和气血阴阳的功能异常等10个维度,构建“中医生存质量自评量表”,收集临床信息,借用SAS 6.12统计分析。结果:信度系数R>0.70,克朗巴赫α系数均大于0.7,标准关联效度系数均大于0.5(P<0.0001),单因素方差分析P<0.0001。结论:量表的可行性、结构稳定性、内部一致性较好,能够区分正常人群和患病人群。但因子分析结果不理想。 Objective: To found and assess the feasibility, the reliability, the validity and the responsibility of a self-evaluation scale of life quality of TCM. Methods: Guided by the holism of TCM, and based on ten dimensions of the whole symptom and abnormal function performance of five Zangs, Qi, Xue, Yin and Yang, the self-evaluation scale of life quality of TCM was founded in terms of the characteristic of clinical information and syndrome differentiation of TCM Medicine. Clinical information was collected and analyzed by SAS 6.12. Results: The coefficient of reliability R〉0.70. The Cronbach coefficient a 〉 0.70. The criterion-related validity all over 0.5 ( P 〈 0. 0001 ). The result of the one-way ANOVA P〈 0. 0001. Conclusion: The feasibility, the criterion-related validity and internal consistency were satisfacto- ry. The scale could differentiate the patients from subjects. But the factor analysis is not an ideal result.
出处 《山东中医药大学学报》 2007年第3期182-185,共4页 Journal of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30271564)
关键词 中医生存质量量表 信度 效度 反应度 中医基础研究 scale of life quality of TCM the reliability the validity the responsibility basic study of TCM
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献38

  • 1郝元涛,孙希凤,方积乾,吴少敏,朱淑明.量表条目筛选的统计学方法研究[J].中国卫生统计,2004,21(4):209-211. 被引量:173
  • 2杨廷忠,阮哈建,李甫中.结构方程模型方法在流行病学研究中的应用[J].中华流行病学杂志,2005,26(4):297-300. 被引量:31
  • 3Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al.SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide.Boston: New England Medical Center the Health Institute,1993.1-12.
  • 4Perneger TV, Leplege A, Etter JF,et al.Validation of a French-language version of the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36) in young healthy adults.J Clin Epidemiol, 1995,48:1051-1060.
  • 5Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D.Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.J Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46:1417-1432.
  • 6Gandek B, Ware JE Jr.Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach.International Quality of Life Assessment.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:953-959.
  • 7顾杏元,金丕焕.直线回归与相关.见: 金丕焕,主编.医用统计方法.上海:上海医科大学出版社,1993.115-119.
  • 8Lam CL, Gandek B, Ren XS, et al.Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese(HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1139-1147.
  • 9Ren XS, Amick B 3rd, Zhou L, et al.Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey in the United States.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1129-1138.
  • 10Till JE, Osoba D, Pater JL, et al.Research on health-related quality of life: dissemination into practical applications.Qual Life Res, 1994,3:279-283.

共引文献2415

同被引文献364

引证文献19

二级引证文献241

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部