期刊文献+

支架成形术治疗颈动脉狭窄的脑血流定量评价 被引量:10

Quantitative evaluation of cerebral blood flow by XeCT in stenting angioplasty for carotid artery stenosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的利用氙气CT(XeCT)技术分析颈动脉重度狭窄的血流动力学特点,并以此评价支架成形术的疗效。方法对13例颈动脉重度狭窄进行支架成形治疗,并利用XeCT进行血流定量评价。患者术前及术后1周分别接受XeCT检查,根据病变侧大脑皮层的脑血流值分为正常区、轻度缺血区、可逆性缺血区和梗死区,并按缺血面积大小作术前、术后对比。结果所有患者术前局部脑血流量均有不同程度降低,以大脑中动脉分布区最为显著;术后脑血流值有显著改善,轻度缺血区面积由32.63%变为14.22%,可逆性缺血区面积由13.54%变为8.38%,正常区域面积由47.51%变为71.13%,而梗死面积无显著变化。结论颈动脉重度狭窄时,脑组织存在易导致脑梗死的缺血区域,支架成形术治疗可明显改善患者的血流动力学障碍,其疗效可以通过定量的脑血流测定得到客观和准确的评价。 Objective To evaluate the hemodynamic characteristics of severe carotid artery stenosis and curative effect of stent angioplasty through XeCT. Methods From April 2006 to November 2006, 13 patients with severe carotid artery stenoses underwent stent angioplasty in our hospital, including 11 male and 2 females, in an average age of 57.31 ± 6.12. All patients underwent XeCT examination to evaluate the quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF). The ischemic cortex is categorized into 4 kinds, the normal region, oligemia area, reversible ischemic site and ischemic core center. Measurement and comparison of the changes were taken before and after the therapy. Results Preoperative XeCT revealed different decrease of CBF in the ipsilateral cortex, especially in MCA distributing territory. Ischemic areas reduced significantly after the stenting angioplasty. Oligemia area reduced from 32.63% to 14.22%. Reversible ischemic area reduced from 13.54% to 8.38%. Normal area increased from 47.51% to 71.13%. But ischemic core center showed no significant changes. Conclusions XeCT is beneficial for evaluation of the hemodynamic characteristics of carotid artery stenoses and also for accurately demonstrating the curative effects of the stent angioplasty. (J Intervent Radiol, 2007, 16: 295-298)
出处 《介入放射学杂志》 CSCD 2007年第5期295-298,共4页 Journal of Interventional Radiology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(30500519) 北京市重大科技攻关计划资助(D0905002040231 D0905004040131)
关键词 颈动脉狭窄 氙气CT 支架 脑血流 Carotid Artery Stenoses XeCT Stent Cerebral Blood Flow
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Kluytmans M,van der Grond J,van Everdingen KJ,et al.Cerebral hemodynamics in relation to patterns of collateral flow[J].Stroke,1999,30:1432-1439.
  • 2凌锋,焦力群,代表国家"十五"医学攻关脑卒中规范化外科治疗技术推广应用研究课题组.颈动脉内膜剥脱术与支架成形术对颈动脉粥样硬化性狭窄治疗的初步研究[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2006,3(1):4-8. 被引量:60
  • 3North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators.Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade stenosis[J].N Engl J Med,1991,325:445.
  • 4CASANOVA Study Group.Carotid surgery versus medical therapy in asymptomatic carotid stenosis[J].Stroke,1991,22:1229.
  • 5Wholey MH,Mathias K,Roubin GS,et al.Global experience in cervical carotid artery stent Placement.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2000,50:160Roussel SA.
  • 6van Bruggen N,King MD.Identification of collaterally perfused areas following focal cerebral ischemia in the rat by comparison of gradient echo and diffusion-weighted MRI[J].J Cereb Blood Flow Metab,1995,15:578-586.
  • 7Grubb RL,Derdeyn CP,Fritsch SM,et al.Importance of hemodynamic factors in the prognosis of symptomatic carotid occlusion[J].JAMA,1998,280:1055.
  • 8Marlene W,Yves B,Patrice A,et al.Vasodilatory Response of Border Zones to Acetazolamide Before and After Endarterectomy[J].Stroke,2000,31:1561.
  • 9焦力群,凌锋,李慎茂,缪中荣,吉迅明,朱凤水,宋庆斌.灌注核磁共振技术对颈动脉系统狭窄或闭塞的血流动力学和外科疗效的评价[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(1):60-63. 被引量:3
  • 10Yamashita T,Nakano S,Ishihara H,et al.Surgical modulation of the natural course of collateral circulation in chronic ischemic patients[J].Acta Neurol Scand,1996,166:74-78.

二级参考文献29

  • 1[1]Jordan WD Jr,Schroeder PT,Fisher WS,et al.A comparison of angioplasty with stenting versus endarterectomy for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis.Ann Vasc Surg,1997,11:2-8.
  • 2[2]Jordan WD Jr,Voellinger DC,Doblar DD,et al.Microemboli detected by transcranial Doppler monitoring in patients during carotid angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy.Cardiovasc Surg,1999,7:33-38.
  • 3[3]Poppert H,Wolf O,Resch M,et al.Differences in number,size and location of intracranial microembolic lesions after surgical versus endovascular treatment without protection device of carotid artery stenosis.J Neurol,2004,251:1198-1203.
  • 4[4]Mericle RA,Kim SH,Lanzino G,et al.Carotid artery angioplasty and use of stents in high-risk patients with contralateral occlusions.J Neurosurg,1999,90:1031-1036.
  • 5[5]Hobson RW,GoldsteinJE,Jamil Z,et al.Carotid restenosis:operative and endovascular management.J Vasc Surg,1999,29:228-235.
  • 6[6]Aburahma F,Bates MC,Stone PA,et al.Comparative study of operative treatment and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stenting for recurrent carotid disease.J Vasc Surg,2001,34:831-838.
  • 7[7]Jordan WD Jr,Alcocer F,Wirthlin DJ,et al.High-risk carotid endarterectomy:challenges for carotid stent protocols.J Vasc Surg,2002,35:16-21.
  • 8[8]Illig KA,Zhang R,Tanski W,et al.Is the rationale for carotid angioplasty and stenting in patients excluded from NASCET/ACAS or eligible for ARCHeR justified.? J Vasc Surg,2003,37:575-581.
  • 9[9]Kasirajan K,Matteson B,Marek JM,et al.Comparison of nonneurological events in high-risk patients treated by carotid angioplasty versus endarterectomy.Am J Surg,2003,185:301-304.
  • 10[10]Bowser N,Bandyk DF,Evans A,et al.Outcome of carotid stent-assisted angioplasty versus open surgical repair of recurrent carotid stenosis.J Vasc Surg,2003,38:432-438.

共引文献61

同被引文献114

引证文献10

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部