摘要
大陆法系国家或地区在未成年学生伤害事故中归责原则的适用上差异较大;英美法系国家则以过错责任原则处理之。我国现行立法规定以过错责任为原则,但学理争议较大。本文在比较法的视角上,为立法完善与适用的价值取向提供参考。
Civil law countries or area upper difference suitable for use hurting accident middle imputation in immaturity student is bigger; The UK - US genealogy of law country is that responsibility principle handles that with fault. Legislation of our country currently in effect stipulate that responsibility is principle with fault, scientific principle or law dispute is bigger but. The main body of a book is drawn up on the comparison method visual angle , is is perfect legislation choose with value suitable for use to providing a reference.
出处
《中州大学学报》
2007年第2期5-7,共3页
Journal of Zhongzhou University
基金
河南省社会科学规划项目(2005EFX010)
关键词
未成年学生伤害事故
归责原则
适用比较
the immaturity student hurts accident
imputation principles of torts
comparison of application