期刊文献+

联合国人权公约缔约国报告制度述评 被引量:5

On the State Parties Reporting System of UN Human Rights Conventions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 缔约国报告制度是联合国人权公约监督实施的主要手段,是一种通过寻求人权国际保护与国家主权之间的平衡,从而促使缔约国履行尊重和保护人权的有效手段。缔约国报告制度的主要特征是独立专家机构通过接受,审查缔约国提交的报告,与缔约国建立建设性对话关系,从而促使缔约国履行人权公约规定的义务。缔约国报告制度从产生发展到今天,其运行存在一定问题,主要原因是国家没有正确认识这种监督实施措施的性质,正确处理人权国际保护与国家主权之间的关系。国际社会应该对缔约国报告制度进一步改革,国家应该增强与国际社会合作的意愿。联合国人权公约缔约国报告制度才能充分发挥其监督作用。 State parties reporting system is the main supervising way for implementation under the UN human rights conventions. It is also the effective way to promote the state parties to respect and protect human rights by seeking the balance between the international human rights protection and state sovereignty. The main character of state parties reporting system is try to build the relationship of constructive dialogue between state parties and the international supervising committee by receiving and examine the reports submitted by state parties. From the beginning till now, there exists some obstacles of the state parties reporting system for the reasons that the state parties did not realize the character of the state reporting system and did not know how to balance the international human rights protection and state sovereignty. International society should revise the state parties reporting system and enhance the cooperation between state parties and international society in order to effect the supervising function of the state parties system under UN human rights system.
作者 彭锡华
出处 《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2007年第3期336-340,共5页 Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
基金 国家社科基金一般项目(01BFX031)
关键词 缔约国 报告制度 人权国际保护 主权 建设性对话关系 state parties reporting system international human rights protection sovereignty constructive dialogue
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献8

  • 1W. Michael Reisman, Sovereignty and Human Rights in Contemporary International Law, The American Journal of International Law, vol.84, 1990.
  • 2Gene M . Lyons and Michael Mastanduno, Beyond Westaphalia? State Sovereignty and International Intervention, The Johns Hopkins University Press 1995.
  • 3Stephen D. Krasner, Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton University Press, 1999.
  • 4Peter Malanczuk, Akehurst's Modern Introduction to International Law, London 1997.
  • 5Sohail H Hashmi ed., State Sovereignty :Change and Persistence in International Relations, The Pennsylvania State University, 1997.
  • 6H Lauterpacht, The Grotian Tradition in International Law,in John Dunn etc. ed., Grotius, vol. 1, An Elgar Reference Collection, 1997.
  • 7See H. Steiner and P. Alston eds., International Human Rights in Context , Clarendon Press, 1996.
  • 8Louis Henkin, The Human Rights in Contemporary China: A Comparative Perspective, Columbia University Press, 1986.

共引文献14

同被引文献22

引证文献5

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部