摘要
国际合作研究从兴起至今已有30多年。国际关系的三个主流学派——新现实主义、新自由制度主义和建构主义——基于对国际体系(结构和单位)的不同假定而做出不同的国家利益界定,演绎出了不同的国际合作解释。国际合作研究取得了一系列重要成果,初步形成了国际合作理论体系。思考三种合作理论的局限,可以尝试建立一种结合权力、认知、制度的综合解释模式。
It has been 30 years since the emergence of international cooperation study. This essay is a comparison of the international cooperation theories from the three main IR schools-neorealism, neoliberal institutionalism and constructionism, specifically, how they set their hypothesises and consequently define ＂ national interest＂ and then deduce their explanations of international cooperation. The shared knowledge from the three schools is mentioned as well. Examining the limits of the three cooperation theories, it is suggested to construct a comprehensive explanation model which imbibes the strength of perspective of power, cognition or institution.
出处
《武汉大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2007年第3期433-439,共7页
Wuhan University Journal：Philosophy & Social Science
关键词
国际合作
国家利益
新现实主义
新自由制度主义
建构主义
international cooperation
national interest
neorealism
neoliberal institutionalism
constructionism
