摘要
郭沂先生在《〈淮南子.缪称训〉所见子思〈累德篇〉考》一文中指出,《淮南子.缪称训》除首尾两段为编者所加前言、后语外,其他部分是子思《累德篇》佚文。虽然《淮南子.缪称训》多处引用《子思子》,但其主体部分有很多语句明显是道家者语,不可能全部出自儒家书《子思子》。现有资料不能证明它的主体部分就是《累德篇》佚文。
Guo Yi has an idea that bedsides the foreword at the be ginning and the postscript at the end written by the editor, all the rest in Miu Cheng Xun is Lei De Plan. Though there are many quotations from Zisi's Work in Miu Cheng Xun, we couldn't conclude that the main part of Miu Cheng Xun is Lei De Pian, because it is deeply affected by the thoughts of Taoism
出处
《史学月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第5期92-97,共6页
Journal of Historical Science