1Messick,S.The Interplay of Evidence anti Consequences in the Validation of Performance Assessments[ J ].Educational Researcher, 1994,23 ( 2 ): 13-23.
2Riding, R.& Sadler-Smith,E.Type of Instructional Material,Cognitive Style and learning Performance[ J ].Educational Studies,1992,18( 3 ): 323-339.
3Witkin, H.A.,Moore, C.A.,Goodenough, D.A.,& Cox,P.W. Field-Dependence and Field-Independence and Their Educational Implications [J ].Review of Education Research,1997,47( 1 ): 1-64.
4Kagan,J.Reflectivity-impulsivity:The generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo[ J ].Journal of Abnormal Psychology,1966,71( 1 ):17-24.
5Ellis,R.Second Language Acquisition[M].Shanghai:Shanghai Foreign Languages Education Press,2000:67.
6Arn old J.Affect in Language Learning [M ].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1999:34.
7RichardsJ.C.The Context of Language Teaching [M ].Beijing:Foreigu Languages Teaching and Research Press,2001:72.
7Abraham, R. Field independence-dependence and the teaching of grammar [J]. TESOL Quarterly, 1985, 20: 689 - 702.
8Brown, D. Principles of Language Learningand Teaching [M].New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1987.
9Chapelle, C. And Roberts, C. Ambiguity tolerance and field inde pendence as predictors of proficiency in English as a second language [J ]. Language Learning, 1986, 36:27 - 45.
10Day, R.. Student participation in the ESL dessroom or some imperfections in practice [J]. Language Learning, 1984, 34(3):69- 102.
