塞尔对海德格尔“视角主义”立场的批评被引量：6

Searle’s Critique of Heidegger’s “Perspectivism”

导出

摘要 Perspectivalism has been widely interpreted as the doctrine that the truth-value of any proposition is decided by a relevant observer, and there is no truth beyond one’s perspective. Perspectivalism so construed has been quite prosperous in contemporary Western philosophy. According to Searle’s understanding, Heidegger is another perspectivalist in the sense that his phenomenological methodology does exclude the validity of the physical reality from the Dasein’s perspective. However, this is exactly the point where Searle cannot agree with Heidegger, because Heidegger’s perspectivalist framework will inevitably frustrate any attempt to formulate the basic concern of Anglo-American philosophy of mind, viz. How to combine the perspective of a particular person inside the world with an objective or scientific view of that same world? Perspectivalism has been widely interpreted as the doctrine that the truth-value of any proposition is decided by a relevant observer, and there is no truth beyond one’s perspective. Perspectivalism so construed has been quite prosperous in contemporary Western philosophy. According to Searle’s understanding, Heidegger is another perspectivalist in the sense that his phenomenological methodology does exclude the validity of the physical reality from the Dasein’s perspective. However, this is exactly the point where Searle cannot agree with Heidegger, because Heidegger’s perspectivalist framework will inevitably frustrate any attempt to formulate the basic concern of Anglo-American philosophy of mind, viz. How to combine the perspective of a particular person inside the world with an objective or scientific view of that same world?

作者徐英瑾

机构地区复旦大学哲学学院

出处《哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第5期53-58,共6页 Philosophical Research

基金复旦大学"985工程"哲学社会科学创新基地2005年度研究项目"杜威哲学的当代意义"(编号05FCZD0012)的资助。

关键词视角主义海德格尔西方哲学批评塞尔哲学传统发展趋势哲学家

分类号 B516.47 [哲学宗教—外国哲学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献11

1海德格尔著陈嘉映王庆节合译.《存在与时间》[M].北京三联书店,1999年版.第6页.
2韩东晖.后分析哲学时代与英美-欧陆的哲学对话[J].中国人民大学学报,2006,20(4):37-43. 被引量：5
3李红,韩东晖.今日英国分析哲学掠影——访英国哲学家达米特和珍·希尔[J].哲学动态,2007(3):27-32. 被引量：3
4普特南.《理性、真理与历史》[M].上海译文出版社,1997年.第138页,第159页,第160页.
5塞尔.《心灵、语言和社会》李步楼译，上海译文出版社，2001，pp．142-43.
6Dreyfus, Hubert, 1993,“Heidegger' s critique of the Husserl/Searle account of intentionality”, in Social Research 60 (1).
7Merleau-Ponty, 1962, Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Colin Smith, Routledge.
8Nagel, Thomas, 1986, The Point from Nowhere, Oxford University Press.
9Searle, John, 2004a, “Phenomenological illusions”. http : //ist-socrates. berkeley. edu/- jsearle/articles. html.
10Searle, John,2004b, Mirid, an Introduction, Oxford University Press.

二级参考文献34

1韩东晖.后分析哲学时代与英美-欧陆的哲学对话[J].中国人民大学学报,2006,20(4):37-43. 被引量：5
2Nicholas Rescher. American Philosophy Today and Other Philosophical Studies[M] . Rowman and Littlefield Pub Inc. , 1994.
3Richard Rorty. Philosophy in America Today[A]. in Richard Rorty. Consequences of Pragmatism [C].Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.
4Jeanne Peijnenburg. Identity and Difference:A Hundred Years of Analytic Philosophy [J]. Metaphilosophy, 2000,31(4):366-381.
5Gilbert Ryle, Theory of Meaning[A]. in Caton,Charles E. (ed.). Philosophy and Ordinary Language [C]. Urhana, IL. University of Illinois Press, 1963.
6Dummett, Michael. Origins of Analytical Philosophy[ M]. London: Duckworth, 1993.
7Peter M. S. Hacker. Wittgenstein's Place in 20th Century Analytic Philosophy[M]. Oxford: Black-well, 1996.
8Anthony Kenny. The Oxford History of Western Philosophy[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2001.
9瑞彻．分析哲学的兴起与衰落[A]．陈波主编.分析哲学：回顾与反省[C]．成都：四川教育出版社，2001．
10希拉里·普特南．从内部看分析哲学的半个世纪[A].陈波主编．分析哲学：回顾与反省[C]．成都：四川教育出版社，2001．